CWJC/15810/2017 of Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors on 21 December 2019

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Planning andDevelopment Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Engineer, Planning and Development Department, Government ofBihar, Patna. Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Patna.

4. The District Planning Officer, Purnea.

5. The Superintendent Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, WorksCircle, Purnea. Circle, Purnea.

6. The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization,WorksDivision - 2, Banmankhi, Purnea. Division - 2, Banmankhi, Purnea.

7. The Assistant Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization WorksDivision - 2, Banmankhi, Purnea. Division - 2, Banmankhi, Purnea.

8. The Junior Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Works Division- 2, Banmankhi, Purnea. - 2, Banmankhi, Purnea.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER

21-12-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted toapproach the tribunal constituted for deciding dispute as to workcontract i.e. the Bihar Public Works Contracts DisputesArbitration Tribunal. The present dispute pertains to F2agreement, considering the fact that for deciding such dispute Prakash Narayan /- U

tribunal has been constituted the writ court is not the appropriateand convenient forum.

Considering the aforesaid, this petition is disposed ofwith a liberty to the petitioner to approach the tribunal and raiseall his dispute of F2 agreement in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, this petition disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)