Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47952/2013 of Ranjeet Singh Vs The State Of Bihar on 24 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47952 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Ranjeet Singh Son Of Late Girija Singh Resident Of Village - Ismailpur, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... ....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No.47952 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Ranjeet Singh Son Of Late Girija Singh Resident Of Village - Ismailpur, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State Of Bihar
Versus
.... .... Petitioner
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Harsh, advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGHORAL ORDER
2 24-12-2013
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
It has been stated in paragraph 3 of the application that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even as per the first information report no offence under section 27 of the Arms Act is made out against this petitioner. He further submits that as per the prosecution story the petitioner assaulted the informant with iron rod and also snatched a golden chain worth Rs. 45,000/- from the informant’s son. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, referring to the injury report, that the injury falsifies the prosecution case and the injury has been found to be simple in nature. He submits that it is highly improbable that the petitioner, in the facts and circumstances alleged, would snatch golden chain.
Considering the submission as above and the facts and circumstances in which the case came to be instituted as also the submission that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Bidupur P.S. case No. 149/2013, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)