Patna High Court
CR. MISC./46838/2013 of Mumtaz Rain Vs The State Of Bihar on 24 December 2013
Cr.Misc. No.46838 of 2013 (4) dt.24-12-2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46838 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Mumtaz Rain Son Of Late Kamreddin Rain Resident Of Mohallah - Sahjuma, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No.46838 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Mumtaz Rain Son Of Late Kamreddin Rain Resident Of Mohallah - Sahjuma, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh, APP
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGHORAL ORDER
4 24-12-2013
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture therefore.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner at the very outset had submitted that at the time of marriage of the informant with the petitioner, she was carrying pregnancy which fact was concealed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Informant, on the other hand, in reply submitted that the informant was carrying Arun Kumar/- the pregnancy out of a relationship between her and the petitioner which fact has seriously disputed on behalf of the petitioner.
In response to a query made by the Court, both the parties have agreed to go for a D.N.A. Test.
A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner specifically stating there that the petitioner is ready for a DNA test to assess the parentage of the child.
In view of the above, the petitioner above named is directred to surrender before the Court of learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram(T) P.S. Case No. 813 of 2013 within three weeks from today, whereupon he will be released on provisional bail.
The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram thereafter order for DNA Test and will confirm the provisional bail only if it is found to be negative.
In case it is found to be positive the provisional bail granted by virtue of this order shall stand cancelled.
With this observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)