CWJC/2012/2008 of ANAND LAL SAH Vs THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO on 24 December 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.997 of 2008

YADUNANDAN JHA,.

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. & ORS.

with

CWJC No.1214 of 2008

RAM BHUSHAN JHA

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.1241 of 2008

RAMBRIKSHA YADAV

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS

with

CWJC No.1624 of 2008

RAM SOGARATH DEVI

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.1810 of 2008

KAPILDEO PRASAD SINHA

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.1825 of 2008

AWADH BIHARI PANDEY

Versus

THE CHAIRMAN,B.S.E.B. & ORS

with

CWJC No.1883 of 2008

UMESH PRASAD SINGH

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2012 of 2008

ANAND LAL SAH

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2084 of 2008

FAKIRA RAI

Versus

BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2098 of 2008

MANPUJAN SINGH

Versus

THE CHAIRMAN,B.S.E.B. & ORS

with

CWJC No.2225 of 2008

2. GOPAL PRASAD SINGH

Versus

BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2436 of 2008

BRAJ BHUSHAN CHAUDHARY

Versus

BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2602 of 2008

SIDHESHWAR RAM

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2844 of 2008

RAMJANAM YADAV

Versus

BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2941 of 2008

BHIKHARI RAM

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

with

CWJC No.2972 of 2008

KAMLA KANT CHOUBEY

Versus

THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

-----------

24/12/2009

Heard the parties.

In all the above writ applications, the grievances of the petitioners are with regard to payment of their retiral dues/balance retiral dues which have not been paid despite representations made in this regard.

In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their unpaid claims, petitioners propose to file their fresh separate representation before the Secretary of the respondent Board stating the details and distinct unpaid claims as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of such claims along S.Ali with certified copy of the present order.

In case such representations are filed by the writ petitioners stating the details of their unpaid claims as also the copy of the relevant documents along with certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the unpaid claims of the petitioners could be settled and admitted due be paid with statutory interest without further delay. It is however, made clear that if any of the claims are found not admissible, the concerned writ-petitioners shall be informed of the same with the reasons thereof. Accordingly, the entire above writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions.

(Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)