Patna High Court

CWJC/23140/2018 of Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors on 21 December 2018

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23140 of 2018 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Singh s/o Sri Shyam Bahadur Singh, resident of village Khaprail chak, P.S. Bazar, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

221-12-2018

Tiwary/-

U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23140 of 2018

======================================================

Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Singh s/o Sri Shyam BahadurSingh, resident of village Khaprail chak, P.S. Bazar, District Patna.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAHORAL ORDER

Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthe petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted liberty tofile representation before the respondent no.5 and therespondent no.5 may be directed to dispose of the representationof the petitioner within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shallfile a representation before the respondent no.5 regarding hisgrievances raised in the writ petition within a period of twoweeks from today and the respondent no.5 is directed to disposeof the same within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

The present writ petition is disposed of on theaforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead