Patna High Court

CR. WJC/283/2020 of BABITA KUMARI @ BABITA DEVI Vs The State of Bihar through Home Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. on 22 December 2023

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.283 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Babita Kumari @ Babita Devi, W/o Gopal Mandal @ Sumit Kumar, R/o- Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Bihpur,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.283 of 2020

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Bhagalpur

======================================================

Babita Kumari @ Babita Devi, W/o Gopal Mandal @ Sumit Kumar, R/o-Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur, Present Address- D/oLate Naresh Prasad, Village- Harbanshpur, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Home Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, OldSecretariat, Patna.Secretariat, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Navgachhiya, Bhagalpur.

5. The Officer-in-Charge, Bihpur, P.S.- Bihpur, Bhagalpur.

6. Gopal Mandal @ Sumit Kumar, S/O Ram Swaroop Mandal R/O village -Sonbarsa, P.S.- Bihpur, District-BhagalpurSonbarsa, P.S.- Bihpur, District-Bhagalpur

... ... Respondents

Page 1 of 2

Appearance :

For the PetitionerFor the State

: Mr. Kumar Binode Bariar, Advocate: Mr. Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASADORAL ORDER

Although the case has been listed under heading ‘For Orders on Office Notes’ because the notice could not be servedupon the private respondent no. 6 who has allegedly married toanother lady and has been living outside and he could not befound on the given address, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that he seeks permission to withdraw this writapplication with liberty to file an application under Section156(3) Cr.P.C. in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrateof the competent court.

2. Mr. Irshad, learned AC to SC-1 appears for the lekhi/- U

State and has no objection to the same.

3. This application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy before appropriatecourt. If any such application is filed, the same will beconsidered by the competent court on its own merit as the writpetitioner was before this Court for last about four years undersome wrong legal advice.

4. This application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead