Patna High Court

CR. MISC./45389/2012 of Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kumar Mukhiya and Anr Vs The State Of Bihar on 19 December 2012

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45389 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kumar Mukhiya S/O Late Kailu Singh Resident Of Village- Fakirana, P.S.- Karjain, District- Supaul 2. Jawahar Prasad Singh @ Jawahar Singh S/O Ram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No.45389 of 2012

======================================================

1. Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kumar Mukhiya S/O Late Kailu Singh Resident Of Village- Fakirana, P.S.- Karjain, District- Supaul

2. Jawahar Prasad Singh @ Jawahar Singh S/O Ram Kishun Singh Resident Of Village- Fakirana, P.S.- Karjain, District- Supaul

.... .... Petitioner/s .... .... Opposite Party/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LALORAL ORDER

2

19-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is an application for grant of bail to the accused-petitioners for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20 B, 22 and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

It is submitted that the petitioners have not been named in the FIR. 10 kg. of ganja has been recovered from the possession of Bhola Mukhiya and Jugeshwar Mukhiya. Co-accused Bhola Mukhiya has confessed his guilt and has also named the petitioners and two others, namely, Ramesh Mandal and Ramchandra Mandal. It is further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances Ramesh Mandal and Ram Chandra Mandal have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 16351 of 2012.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2[nd]Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul in Ratanpura P. S. Case No. 28 of 2010 corresponding to Special Case No. 11 of 2010 with following conditions:-

Page 1 of 2

(i) The petitioners will not indulge themselves in similar or any other offence. similar or any other offence.

(ii) One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioners. petitioners.

(iii) The petitioners will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, their bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, their bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead