Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/984/2021 of VIKRAM RANDHAWA Vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH COMMSSR/SECY HOUSING AND URBAN DEPTT AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 984/2021 CM No. 8486/2021 CM No. 4044/2021 CM No. 4045/2021 Vikram Randhawa ….Petitioner(s) Through:- Mr. Parag Sharma, Advocate V/s Union Territory of J&K and others ….Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 984/2021 CM No. 8486/2021 CM No. 4044/2021 CM No. 4045/2021
Vikram Randhawa
….Petitioner(s)
Through:-
Mr. Parag Sharma, Advocate
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :-
Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate Mr. K. Nirmal Kotwal, Advocate
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 30.12.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance projected in the petition stands redressed by the official respondents as such, the petition is not being pressed. Statement of counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.
Petition shall stand dismissed as not pressed along with all connected CM(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
,
,,
Jammu: 30.12.2022 Meenakshi
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge