Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CPSW/27/2019 of ESHAN PANDITA Vs KHURSHID AHMED SHAH COMM..REVENUE DEPTT.AND ANR. on 31 December 2019
OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CPSW No. 27/2019 in SWP No. 37/2019 IA No. 1/2019 Eshan Pandita .....Petitioner (s) Through :- Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate V/s Khurshid Ahmed Shah, Comm/Secy PW(R&B) Department and another .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG for respondent No. 2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 27/2019 in SWP No. 37/2019 IA No. 1/2019
Eshan Pandita
.....Petitioner (s)
Through :-Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate
V/s
Khurshid Ahmed Shah, Comm/Secy PW(R&B) Department and another
.....Respondent(s)
Coram:
Through :-Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG for respondent No. 2 Mr. Sudesh Magotra, Dy. AG vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for respondent No. 1
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up today, Mr. Amit Gupta, learned AAG appearing on behalf of the SSB produced before the Court an order dated 30.12.2019, wherein it is mentioned that the order No. 367-SSB of 2015 dated 17.08.2015 is rescinded/withdrawn to the extent of the petitioner and further that the candidature of the petitioner, namely, Eshan Pandita, S/o Pran Nath Pandita, R/o H. No. 32, Sector-1, Vikas Nagar, Sarwal, Jammu figuring at Sr. No.19/OM stands recommended for the post of Junior Engineer (Mechanical) pursuant to Advertisement No. 01 of 2012, dated 19.07.2012 at Item No. 046. However, other terms and conditions shall remain the same as conveyed vide letter No. SSB/Sel/Secy/012/255-58 dated 03.02.2012. The said order is taken on record.
Mr. Amit Gupta, learned AAG further stated that the SSB has already issued an order, recommending the case of the petitioner. Now, it is the indenting department to issue appointment order in favour of the petitioner for the aforementioned post.
Be that as it may, this contempt petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No. 1 i.e. the Commissioner/Secretary to the Government, PW(R&B) Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu to issue appointment order in favour of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date, a copy of this order along with complete set of paper-book is made available to him.
With the aforesaid directions, contempt petition stands disposed of.
Jammu 31.12.2019 Muneesh
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge