Rajasthan High Court

CW/1290/2000 of MOHAMMED SALIM Vs STATE and ORS on 4 September 2001

COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CIVIL WRIT NO. 1299 / 2000 DHARAM CHAND & ANR. ----Petitioners Versus STATE & ORS. ----Respondents __________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. V.K. Agarwal For Respondents : Mr. Vishal Singhal for respondent No.4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B.CIVIL WRIT NO. 1299 / 2000

DHARAM CHAND & ANR.

----Petitioners

Versus

STATE & ORS.

----Respondents

__________________________________________

For Petitioners :

Mr. V.K. Agarwal

For Respondents :Mr. Vishal Singhal for respondent No.4

__________________________________________

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Order

13/12/2016

Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 states that thearguing counsel Mr. R.K. Singhal has expired and therefore timebe granted to him to seek instructions.

Put up in the last week of January,2017, as prayed.

(NIRMALJIT KAUR)J.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead