Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CRM(M)/40/2023 of SAYED MASARAT ALI AND OTHERS Vs ASMA BUKHARI on 30 December 2023

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CRM(M) No. 40/2023 CrlM No. 55/2023 1. Sayed Mussarat Ali, Age 36 years S/o Late Nazir Hussain Shah R/o H.No. 104, Ward No.4, Mohalla Kama Khan, opp. G.Post Office, Tehsil Haveli and District Poonch. 2. Imtiaz Hussain Shah, Age 52 years S/o

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU

Case:- CRM(M) No. 40/2023 CrlM No. 55/2023 1.Sayed Mussarat Ali, Age 36 years S/o Late Nazir Hussain Shah R/o H.No. 104, Ward No.4, Mohalla Kama Khan, opp. G.Post Office, Tehsil Haveli and District Poonch. 2.Imtiaz Hussain Shah, Age 52 years S/o Late Nazir Hussain Shah Vo Vlllage Sathra, Tehsil Mandi & District Poonch. 3.Taranam Bukhari, Age 44 Years D/o Late Nazir Hussain Shah Vo Village Sathra, Tehsil Mandi & District Poonch. 4.Afshan Bukhari, Age 37 Years W/o Manawar Hussain Shah R/o Village Khanetar, Tehsil Haveli and District Poonch. 5.Noorain Naqvi, Age 41 years Wo Mumtaz Hussain Shah R/o Village Potha, Tehsil Surankote And District Poonch. 6.Yavar Abass, Age 35 Years S/o Dildar Hussain R/o Village Loran, Tehsil Mandi and District Poonch…..Petitioners Through: Mr. Sayeed Nadeem Hamdani, Advocate

Vs

Asma Bukhari, D/o Sh. Khushnood Hussain Shah, W/o Sayed Massarat Ali, R/o Village Galhutta, Tehsil Mendhar and District Poonch.

.…. Respondent

Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate Mr. Mansoor Mushtaq Manhas, Advocate

2

CRM(M) No. 40/2023

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

ORDER30.12.2023

Page 1 of 2

This petition is disposed of by directing that the proceedings of the case shall proceed on for adjudication on merits before the court of Judicial Magistrate (1[st] Class), Mendhar. However, with respect to the petitioners 2 to 6 herein, who are the respondents 2 to 6 in the matter before the court of Judicial Magistrate (1[st] Class), Mendhar, their appearance through their counsel shall suffice the purpose of proceedings and no personal appearance of the petitioners 2 to 6 herein (respondents 2 to 6 in the said matter) shall be insisted upon unless and until proceedings in the case at the relevant point of time warrant such recourse. The petition is, therefore, disposed of without prejudice to the rights of both the parties in the context of their case.

JAMMU 30.12.2023 Muneesh

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE

Whether the order is speaking : Yes / No Whether the order is reportable : Yes / No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead