Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CRMC/834/2018 of ASEEM GHAI Vs STATE TH.S.H.O.GANDHI NAGAR JAMMU AND ORS. on 31 December 2018

OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CRMC No. 834/2018, IA No. 01/2018 Date of order: 31.12.2018 Aseem Ghai Vs. State of J&K and another Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Judge. Appearing counsel: For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Priyanshu Sharma, Advocate For Respondent (s) : Ms.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU

CRMC No. 834/2018, IA No. 01/2018

Date of order: 31.12.2018

Aseem Ghai Vs. State of J&K and another

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Judge.

Appearing counsel:For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Priyanshu Sharma, Advocate For Respondent (s) : Ms. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate Ms. Rozina Afzal, Advocate

i) Whether to be reported in Digest/Journal : Yes/No. ii) Whether approved for reporting in Press/Media : Yes/No.

1. Heard.

2. From bare perusal of the file, it is evident that revisional court has not decided any right of the parties. He has only directed the parties to appear before the Court below and argue the matter again. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this time has stated that he apprehends that some observations made by the revisional court shall come in way while deciding the matter by the trial court. decided any right of the parties. He has only directed the parties to appear before the Court below and argue the matter again. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this time has stated that he apprehends that some observations made by the revisional court shall come in way while deciding the matter by the trial court.

3. In view of the above, I am of the opinion that trial court has yet to decide the matter, therefore, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the parties to appear before the trial court. The observation made by the revisional court shall not come in the way of trial court while deciding the matter. decide the matter, therefore, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the parties to appear before the trial court. The observation made by the revisional court shall not come in the way of trial court while deciding the matter.

4. Disposed of.

(Sanjay Kumar Gupta)

Judge

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead