Gujarat High Court
CRA/775/1994 of RAMPUR KELVANI MANDAL-BY HEIRSPATEL BECHARBHAI RAMABHAI Vs SHANKAR D.PRAJAPATI-BY HEIRS PRAJAPATI GANGABEN WD/O.SD on 8 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 775 of 1994 with CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1181 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 775 of 1994
with
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1181 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- RAMPUR KELVANI MANDAL-BY HEIRSPATEL BECHARBHAI RAMABHAI
Versus
SHANKAR D.PRAJAPATI-BY HEIRS PRAJAPATI GANGABEN WD/O.SD
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Civil Revision Application No. 775 of 1994
MS KUSUM M SHAH for Petitioners
MR PB MAJMUDAR for Respondent No. 1
None present for Respondents No. 2 to 9
MR VB GHARANIA for Respondent No.10
2. Civil Revision ApplicationNo 1181 of 1997
MS KUSUM M SHAH for Petitioners
MR VB GHARANIA for Respondent No.1
MR PB MAJMUDAR for Respondent No. 2 to 9
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the interim relief which has been granted by this Court in this civil revision application, and keeping in view the interim relief which has been granted by this Court in this civil revision application, I am of the opinion that the interest of justice will be met in case the interim relief, which has been granted by this Court shall continue till the decision of Regular Civil Suits No.106/90 and 124/90 pending in the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Palanpur and the learned trial court is directed to decide the suits within a time bound programme.
The civil revision application is disposed of in the terms that the interim relief which has been granted by this court shall continue till the decision of the suits aforesaid and the learned trial court is directed to decide both the suits within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. In view to decide both the suits within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. In view of the order aforesaid, no order on C.R.A. No.1181/97. Both the civil revision applications and Rule stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.
*********
zgs/-