Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2854/2022 of MOHD ASLAM Vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT AND ORS on 31 December 2022
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2854/2022 CM No. 7933/2022 Mohd. Aslam …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. I. Sherkhan, Advocate. Vs UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
Mohd. Aslam
WP(C) No. 2854/2022 CM No. 7933/2022
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. I. Sherkhan, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER31.12.2022
The petitioner in the instant petition claims to have been appointed as Special Police Officer, (SPO) on 06.03.2005 by the Superintendent of Police, Poonch and consequently, alloted Belt No. SPO, 104. The petitioner states that his services came to be terminated by the respondents on account of unauthorized absence after rendering more than ten years of service by the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner claims to have filed an appeal/representation against the termination of his services way back on 15.09.2016 and 14.04.2017 which are stated to have not been addressed to till date by the respondents, despite repeated requests made.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the nature of controversy involved in the petition would pray for disposal of the petition at this stage with an innocuous direction to the respondents to consider the appeal/representation submitted by the petitioner against the termination order dated 04.06.2015 expeditiously and within some time frame.
Mrs. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG enters appearance and waives notice on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage and is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to address to the appeal/representation claimed to have been filed/submitted by the petitioner against the termination order dated 04.06.2015 in accordance with law, rules and regulations occupying the field. The appeal/representation be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by any observation made herein and if also there is no other legal impediment thereto within eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced by the petitioner before the respondents.
Disposed of. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGEJammu 31.12.2022 Shivalee