Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/12337/2022 of REENA AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-12337-2022 Date of decision : 30.12.2022 Reena and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *** Present :- Mr. Lakhwinder S. Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

128IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-12337-2022Date of decision : 30.12.2022

Reena and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

wee REeSpondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICERAJESH BHARDWAJ222

Present :-Mr. Lakhwinder S. Lakhanpal, Advocate,for the petitioners.for the petitioners.

222

RAJESH BHARDWAJ_J. (Oral)

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for directing respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the lifeand liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents no.4 to 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both thepetitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondentsno.4 to 6 and have sought protection to their life and liberty. Theyapprehend danger from respondents no.4 to 6. Their marriage certificateevidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3. The petitionershave submitted a representation dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-4) torespondent no.2.

Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3-State only.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG,Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with adirection to respondent no.2-Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, District CRWP-12337-2022

Jalandhar to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitionersand grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty isperceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grantimmunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any,committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressedany opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage ofthe petitioners.

Disposed of|

30.12.2022m. sharma

( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned|Yes/NoWhether reportableYes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead