Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2110/2020 of SONIA KUMARI AND ANR Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH DEPTT OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS on 31 December 2020

Supplementary list 1st HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) WP(C) No. 2110/2020 CM No. 8226/2020 CM No. 8227/2020 Sonia Kumari and another …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Joginder Singh, Advocate V/s Union Territory of J&K and others

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode)

Sonia Kumari and another

WP(C) No. 2110/2020 CM No. 8226/2020 CM No. 8227/2020

…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)

Through:-

Mr. Joginder Singh, Advocate

V/s

Union Territory of J&K and others

…..Respondent(s)

Through:- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG

CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 5 to 8. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. Copy of Marriage Certificate dated 15.12.2020 and proof of date of birth have been placed on record. They submit that since they have solemnized the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 5 to 8, as such, they are facing harassment at the hands of respondent Nos. 5 to 8.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr.; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

3. Both the petitioners are present through virtual mode and are identified by their counsel.

Page 1 of 2

4. Perusal of the record annexed with the writ file reveals that petitioners are major and have married each other on 15.12.2020 according to Hindu Rights and Rituals.

5. Any person(s) having attained the age of majority are entitled to marry as per their wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect their life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them.

6. Keeping in view the relief sought, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a view on the basis of the available material. If it is found that the parties are major and have married out of their own free will and consent, the necessary protection shall be extended to them.

7. Disposed ofalongwith CM(s).

JAMMU 31.12.2020 SUNIL-II

(Sindhu Sharma) Judge

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead