Gujarat High Court
CRA/32/1991 of DALWADI ODHAV BHAVANBHAI Vs DALWADI TAPUBHAI BHAVANBHAI on 9 December 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 32 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 32 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- DALWADI ODHAV BHAVANBHAI
Versus
DALWADI TAPUBHAI BHAVANBHAI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR GAURANG H BHATT for Petitioner
MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent No. 1, 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 09/12/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned advocate Mr Gaurang Bhatt appearing for the petitioner has submitted that this revision application has become infructuous for the reason that Regular Civil Suit No. 15 of 1990 filed by the petitioner-plaintiff in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sayala, District Surendranagar was decreed on 20th June, 1996.
He has submitted that the present revision application has been filed for challenging an order dated 19th December, 1990 passed in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 44/90 by the Joint District Judge, Surendranagar whereby an order passed below Exh. 5 in the above referred suit was set aside.
As stated hereinabove, the suit has already been decreed and, therefore, this revision application has become infructuous. This revision application is, therefore, dimissed. Rule is discharged.
Ad-interim relief granted earlier is vacated.
**********
sundar./