Showing 171–180 of more than 190 judgments, newest first 8.34 seconds

  • Bench: Appellate Side, Calcutta✕
  • Judge: Hiranmay Bhattacharyya✕
Filter precedents 2 Reset all

CourtsTotal 1

Decision period

Principal bench / seatlatest 300

Presiding judgeslatest 300

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Calcutta High Court 22 September 2026

    CO/1832/2026 of AMAL CHANDRA KOLAY Vs PARAMITA THAKUR

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/1832/2026

    sg 22-09-2026 Ct. 6 CO 1832 of 2026 Amal Chandra Kolay Versus Paramita Thakur [ Mr. Tapan Kr. Majumder …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge …

  2. Calcutta High Court 21 September 2026

    CO/3277/2026 of DEBABRATA KARMAKAR Vs RUMI BAG KARMAKAR

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/3277/2026

    Court No.6 BP C.O. 3277 of 2026 Sri Debabrata Karmakar -versus- Smt. Rumi Bag (Karmakar) Mr. Pintu Karar Mr. Sabab Uddin Laskar Ms. Meghna Chowdhury .. for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband and is …

  3. Calcutta High Court 21 September 2026

    CO/1689/2026 of AMITAVA BOSE Vs SUSMITA BOSE NEE DAS

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/1689/2026

    Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 1689 of 2026 Amitava Bose Vs. Susmita Bose nee Das & Ors. Mr. Ratul Das Ms. Sanjani Das Mr. Arya Bhattacharyya Ms. Zainab Kalnal ….for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband and is

  4. Calcutta High Court 21 September 2026

    CO/3233/2026 of TAX CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED REPD BY DIRECTOR GOPAL PITTI Vs INDRA KUMAR MOHTA @ INDAR KUMAR MOHTA

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/3233/2026

    21-09-2026 Ct. 6 CO 3233 of 2026 Tax Consultants Private Limited Versus Indra Kumar Mohta & Indar Kumar Mohta [ Mr. Gopal Pitti …petitioner-in-person The Director of the petitioner company appears in person and submits that a direction be passed upon the learned Judge, 3 rd …

  5. Calcutta High Court 21 September 2026

    CO/3246/2026 of NIHAR KUMAR DAN Vs TAMAL KUMAR LAW

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/3246/2026

    21.09.2026 (AD 21) (S. Banerjee) CO 3246 of 2026 Dr. Nihar Kumar Dan Vs. Sri Tamal Kumar Law Mr. Kushal Chatterjee Mr. S. N. Rakshit Mr. Soumyajit Mishra …for the petitioner Mr. Vinay Kumar Purohit …for the opposite-party Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on

  6. Calcutta High Court 21 September 2026

    CO/3003/2026 of BHOLA SONKAR Vs ANIRBAN SENGUPTA

    Bench: Hiranmay BhattacharyyaCO/3003/2026

    Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3003 of 2026 Sri Bhola Sonkar Vs. Sri Anirban Sengupta Mr. Amrita Lal Dhar Ms. Piyali Pal Roy ….for the opposite party None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. No accommodation has been sought for either. Opposite party is represented by his …

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead