Filter results by 2
Courts
Judges in the latest 300
- K.V.Raman1
- J.Sumathi1
- Avadutha Kasinayana Mandalmandal1
- Enforcement Deputy Tahsildar1
- Sessions Judge1
- Tirupathi. Subsequently1
- Peesapati Appalacharyulu1
- Potta Venkata Krishna Rao1
Years
Decided between
Andhra Pradesh High Court — latest judgments
1–10 of 13,278 judgments, newest first (0.17 seconds)
-
WP/13820/2019 of South Central Railway OBC Employees Association, Vs The Union of India,
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos. 9136 and 13820 of 2019 COMMON ORDER : In both the Writ Petitions, after going through the pleadings, I am of the opinion that while exercising the jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is …
-
CRLP/5940/2019 of Nanagavalli Koteswara Rao Vs STATE OF AP
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.5940 of 2019 ORDER:- This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/ A -1 to A -5 under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.202 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial …
-
WP/19887/2019 of Tammareddy Ramesh, Vs UNION OF INDIA
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Writ Petition No.19887 of 2019 ORDER: 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed, seeking of writ of mandamus, directing respondent Nos.2 to 5 to complete process of acquisition vide Section 3A (1) of …
-
WP/21285/2019 of M/s. Sree Lakshmi Venkateshwara Traders, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
T. RAJANI WRIT PETITION No.21285 OF 2019 ORDER: This writ petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to declare the action of the second respondent in interfering with sale and distribution of bio- products of petitioner-firm, as illegal. 2. Heard …
-
CRLP/6088/2019 of G.SRINIVASA RAO Vs STATE OF AP
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.6088 of 2019 ORDER:- This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners, who are A -1 to A -3, in F.I.R.No.257 of 2019 on the file of …
-
WP/19272/2019 of Kamisetty Venkateswara Rao Vs The Sub-Divisional Police Officer,
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.19272 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition at appropriate stage. Permission is accorded as …
-
WP/15987/2002 of Shah Ghulam Nakshaband Rahmathulla, Vs The Administrative cum Senior civil Judge,
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Writ Petition No.15987 of 2002 ORDER : On 24.12.2019, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, in spite of the matter being listed under the caption
-
CRP/2233/2019 of KONDREDDI CHITTIMANI Vs NAGA BAPI RAJU
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Civil Revision Petition No.2233 OF 2019 ORDER:- The challenge in this C.R.P filed by appellant/plaintiff is, to the order, dated 10.06.2019 in CMA.No.06 of 2019 passed by Judge, Family Court-cum-IX Additional District Judge, East Godavari at …
-
WP/14895/2016 of H.B. Govardhan Reddy, Vs Andhra Pradesh Agro Industries Development Corporation
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
T. RAJANI WRIT PETITION No.14895 OF 2016 ORDER: The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. A letter dated 06.12.2019 to that effect was also addressed to the Registrar (Judicial). Permission is granted. Accordingly, the writ …
-
CC/98/2017 of A.TRINADHA RAO, KRISHNA DIST. Vs G. VEERAPANDYAN, KRISHNA DIST.
Andhra Pradesh High Court 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CONTEMPT CASE No.98 OF 2017 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that having regard to the subsequent developments, he is not pressing the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. …