Filter results by 2
Courts
Judges in the latest 45
- Ananya Bandyopadhyay7
- Sugato Majumdar5
- Rajarshi Bharadwaj3
- Subhendu Samanta2
- Arindam Mukherjee2
- Biswajit Basu1
- Hiranmay Bhattacharyya1
- Rajarshi Bharadwaj,Hon'Ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra1
Years
Decided between
Calcutta High Court — latest judgments
1–10 of 45 judgments, newest first (0.28 seconds)
-
CO/2454/1995 of SRI TARA PADA DAS Vs SMT. JOGMAYA DAS
Calcutta High Court 20 December 2001
36, Ct.18 09.08.2021 AJ. C.O. 1798 of 2017 I.A. No: C.A.N. 1 of 2019 (old C.A.N. 9399 of 2019) (C.A.N. application is not here) with C.O. 2454 of 1995 (file is not here) (Via Video Conference) Sri Ajit Kumar Das & Ors. -Vs- Moni Bala Das, since deceased, her heirs and legal …
Biswajit Basu
-
WPA/17579/2001 of PURNENDU CHOWDHURY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Calcutta High Court 14 December 2001
C.P.A.N. 234 of 2002 Purnendu Chowdhury Vs. Pritish Pathak In W.P.A. 17579 of 2001 Purnendu Chowdhury Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called on for hearing. No accommodation is sought for. Accordingly, the writ …
Rajarshi Bharadwaj
-
CS/623/1973 of RELIANCE FIREBRICK & POTTERY CO. LTD. Vs INDIAN MALLEABLE CASTINGS LTD.
Calcutta High Court 29 November 2001
COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IA NO. GA/3/2007 (Old No: GA/1583/2007) In CS/623/1973 RELIANCE FIREBRICK & POTTERY CO. LTD. Vs INDIAN MALLEABLE CASTINGS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 16th June, 2022. The Court:- None …
-
WPO/2377/1992 of INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Vs ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMR. W.B
Calcutta High Court 22 November 2001
(Old No: GA/2692/2008) In WPO/2377/1992 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Vs ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMR. W.B BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 21st January, 2021. Appearance: Mr. …
-
CS/161/1979 of SUNIL AKASH SINHA CHOWDHURY & ANR. Vs SASHI PROPERTIES & INDDUSTRIES LTD.
Calcutta High Court 27 September 2001
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IA NO. GA/2/1998 (Old No: GA/3645/1998) In CS/161/1979 SUNIL AKASH SINHA CHOWDHURY & ANR. Vs SASHI PROPERTIES & INDDUSTRIES LTD. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 22nd July, 2022. The …
-
WPO/1878/1991 of ORISSA CEMENT LTD. & ANR Vs THE STATE OF W.B.
Calcutta High Court 25 September 2001
1 of 2006 (Old No: GA 3124 of 2006) with In WPO 1878 of 1991 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ORISSA CEMENT LTD. & ANR Vs THE STATE OF W.B. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 13th January, 2021. The Court : It …
-
CS/875/1979 of INDIAN BANK Vs SMT.KAILASH RANI
Calcutta High Court 25 September 2001
COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IA NO. GA/1/2001 (Old No:GA/4263/2001) In CS/875/1979 INDIAN BANK Vs SMT.KAILASH RANI BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 22nd July, 2022. The Court: None appears on behalf of the parties nor …
-
CS/876/1979 of INDIAN BANK Vs M/S.J.B.PRODUCTS
Calcutta High Court 25 September 2001
COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IA NO. GA/1/2001 (Old No:GA/4266/2001) In CS/876/1979 INDIAN BANK Vs M/S.J.B.PRODUCTS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 22nd July, 2022. The Court: None appears on behalf of the parties nor …
-
WRIT PETITION 9853 of 2003
Calcutta High Court 20 September 2001
11.12.2024 Item No.84 KS Ct. No.7 W.P.A. 5520 of 2000 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2022(Application not in the file) Nirad Baran GangulyVersus The District Inspector of Schools (Secondary Education)Burdwan & Ors. Mr. Tapas Kumar Bhattacharya …………For the petitioner Mr. Suman Dey ……For …
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
-
WPA/12093/2001 of JAMINI KUMAR BAG Vs W.B.S.E.B.
Calcutta High Court 18 September 2001
W.P.A. 12093 of 2001 Jamini Kumar Bag Vs. W.B.S.E.B. & Ors. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called on for hearing. No accommodation is sought for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. …
Rajarshi Bharadwaj