Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit BiswasMAT/91/2026
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** MAT/91/2026 Ajit Toppo Vs The Chief Engineer and other Mr. N. A . Khan … for the appellant September 21, 2026 [SR] Item No.22 1. An issue regarding the petitioner’s date of birth was raised in the writ proceeding. The
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasCRR/48/2026
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] *** CRR/48/2026 Saumia Sujanan G Vs The State Mr. G.Mini … for the Petitioner Mr. Sumit Kumar Karmakar … for the State September 21, 2026 [AKB] Item No.5 1. The present criminal revisional application has been filed by the
Bench: Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit BiswasWP.ST/18/2025
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad And The Hon’ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas WPST 18 of 2025 Biplab Ghosh Versus The State of West Bengal and others For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. …
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/3961/2011
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 30 Subadip WPA 3961 of 2011 Amit Paul & Anr. Vs. Chief Eng., Cust. Rel. Mgmt. Cell, W.B.S.E.D. Co. Ltd. & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. The instant case be and the same is dismissed for default. 3. No order as to costs. (Prasenjit …
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/2746/2012
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 36 Subadip WPA 2746 of 2012 Ashutosh Chakraborty Vs. The State of W.B. & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 3. Accordingly, the instant case be and the …
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/11248/2012
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 45 Subadip WPA 11248 of 2012 Rohininandan Rath Vs. State of W.B. & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 3. Accordingly, the instant case be and the same …
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/10022/2011
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 35 Subadip WPA 10022 of 2011 + CAN 1 of 2012 (Old No. CAN 10135 of 2012) Jitendra Prasad Vs. The State of W.B. & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 3.
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/10360/2012
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 43 Subadip WPA 10360 of 2012 Manas Kumar Karmakar & Anr. Vs. State of W.B. & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 3. Accordingly, the instant case be and …
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/1563/2011
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 28 Subadip WPA 1563 of 2011 Reliance Communication Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Asansol Durgapur Devp. Authority & Ors. Mr. Sayantan Bose, Ms. Priyanka Gope. …for the respondent no. 1 to 3 (V.C.) 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned Advocate
Bench: Prasenjit BiswasWPA/4561/2010
Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 25 Subadip WPA 4561 of 2010 Rajib Chakraborty Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Kaushik Chatterjee, Mr. Tirthankar Dey. (V.C.)` …for the respondent nos. 7-14 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Advocate representing the respondents/HDFC …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault