Showing 971–980 of more than 990 judgments, newest first 5.81 seconds

  • Calcutta High Court✕
  • Judge: Shampa Sarkar✕
Filter precedents 2 Reset all

CourtsTotal 1

Decision period

Principal bench / seatlatest 300

Presiding judgeslatest 300

Calcutta High Court — latest judgments

  1. Calcutta High Court 30 March 2026

    CPAN/1449/2023 of BILWAPADA MAITY AND ORS Vs SANGEETA MEHTA DAS THE PRADHAN BARUTTARHINGLY GRAM PANCHAYAT

    Bench: Shampa SarkarCPAN/1449/2023

    Court No.12 Sandip CPAN 1449 of 2023 In WPA 8896 of 2023 Bilwapada Maity & Ors. Vs. Smt. Sangeeta Mehta Das, The Pradhan Baruttarhingly Gram Panchayat 1. None appears in support of the application. No accommodation is prayed for. 2. The application for contempt stands dismissed …

  2. Calcutta High Court 30 March 2026

    MAT/545/2026 of KAJALA KHATUN @ KAJALA KHATUN BIBI Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

    Bench: Shampa Sarkar, Ajay Kumar GuptaMAT/545/2026

    Court No.12 (gc) MAT 545 of 2026 CAN 1 of 2026 Kajala Khatun @ Kajala Khatun Bibi Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Oishik Chatterjee, Mr. Raja Das, Mr. Gourav Roy …for the Appellant. Mr. Robiul Islam, Mr. M. Rahaman, Mr. Kazi Ardan … for the Respondents. Mr. Ansar

  3. Calcutta High Court 30 March 2026

    CPAN/1028/2023 of USHA PATRA NALIAS USHA RANI PATRA Vs KALPANA MAITY JANA PRADHAN BALISAI GRAM PANCHAYAT

    Bench: Shampa SarkarCPAN/1028/2023

    Court No.12 Sandip CPAN 1028 of 2023 In WPA 5947 of 2022 Usha Patra alias Usha Rani Patra Vs. Kalpana Maity (Jana), Pradhan, 7, Balisai Gram Panchayat 1. None appears in support of the application. No accommodation is prayed for. 2. The application for contempt stands dismissed …

  4. Calcutta High Court 30 March 2026

    CPAN/1240/2023 of SK.SAIFUL HAQUE@ SK SAIFUL Vs SRI UPANANDA SARDAR, PRADHAN, KUMIRMORAH GRAM PANCHAYAT

    Bench: Shampa SarkarCPAN/1240/2023

    Court No.12 Sandip CPAN 1240 of 2023 In WPA 20584 of 2022 Sk. Saiful Haque @ Sk. Saiful Vs. Sri Upananda Sardar & Anr. 1. None appears in support of the application. No accommodation is prayed for. 2. The application for contempt stands dismissed for default. (Shampa Sarkar,

  5. Calcutta High Court 30 March 2026

    CPAN/332/2023 of AMAL KR. MALLICK Vs DHAVAL JAIN AND ORS.

    Bench: Shampa SarkarCPAN/332/2023

    Court No.12 (gc) CPAN 332 of 2023 In WPA 21306 of 2021 Sri Amal Kumar Mallick Vs. Sri Dhaval Jain & Ors. Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Souvik Das …for the Private Respondents. Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Mr. Ankit Sureka …for the H.M.C. 1. None appears on behalf of the applicant. On

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead