Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Uday KumarCRR/3796/2022
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR CRR 3796 OF 2022 ARCHANA AGARWAL -VS- STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. For the Petitioner : Mr. Mainak Bose, Ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Ld. Adv. Mr. Deokinandan Sharma …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/1795/2024
28 10/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 1795 of 2024 Abulkalam Sk Vs. Chandmon Nahar Bibi & Anr. 1. When the matter is called on, none appears to represent the petitioner. Despite proper direction, he did not appear even on the last occasion, and this matter has been continuously …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2317/2024
42 SL No. 33 AB C.R.R. 2317 of 2024 In the matter of : Smt. Purnima Mandal & Anr. Mr. Mukteswar Maity Ms. Manika Sarkar ……. For the petitioners Mr. Malay Bhattacharya Mr. Kinkar Kumar Bandyopadhyay ……. For respondent no. 1 The petitioners, Smt. Purnima Mandal and
Bench: Uday KumarWPA/19904/2022
3 10/09/2026 Court. No. 42 S.Kundu WPA 19904 of 2022 Narayan Samanta Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Priyankar Basu mallick …for the petitioner. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the case and a written instruction …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2343/2024
34 Ct No. 42 SB CRR 2343 of 2024 Karikar Eduwealth Private Limited & Ors. Vs. Abhishek Paul Mr. Sourav Mondal Mr. Arijit Bhuiya Mr. Rony Mondal … for the petitioners 1. This revisional application has been preferred by the petitioners seeking quashing of the criminal proceeding
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2182/2024
24 09/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 2182 of 2024 Zainul Haque Vs. The Excise Commissioner Mr. Sagar Saha …for the State. 1. An affidavit of service filed by the learned counsel for the State is taken on record. It appears therefrom that the item has already been delivered to …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2503/2017
8 09/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 2503 of 2017 With CRAN 3 of 2018 Harish Bagla Vs. Sharma Exports Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Anurag Modi Ms. Ankita Sikdar …for the petitioner. 1. Despite service of notice and sufficient opportunity granted to the opposite party, none appears …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2544/2017
10 09/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 2544 of 2017 With CRAN 3 of 2018 Harish Bagla Vs. Sharma Exports Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Anurag Modi Ms. Ankita Sikdar …for the petitioner. 1. Despite service of notice and sufficient opportunity granted to the opposite party, none appears …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2500/2017
5 09/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 2500 of 2017 With CRAN 3 of 2018 Harish Bagla Vs. Sharma Exports Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Anurag Modi Ms. Ankita Sikdar …for the petitioner. 1. Despite service of notice and sufficient opportunity granted to the opposite party, none appears …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2504/2017
9 09/09/2026 Court No.42 S.Kundu CRR 2504 of 2017 With CRAN 3 of 2018 Harish Bagla Vs. Sharma Exports Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Anurag Modi Ms. Ankita Sikdar …for the petitioner. 1. Despite service of notice and sufficient opportunity granted to the opposite party, none appears …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault