Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Uday KumarCRR/2591/2017
42 jks 29.07.2026 CRR 2591 of 2017 Dalia Sadhukhan Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. P. Karan Singh … … for the petitioner 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter is called for hearing, nor any accommodation been prayed for. 2. It appears from the
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2677/2017
Jks Ct. No.42 CRR 2677 of 2017 Parbati Dhara & Anr Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. P. Karan Singh … … for the State 1. When the matter is called on for hearing, there is a conspicuous absence on behalf of the petitioner, with no representation being put forth to
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/4350/2022
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR CRR 4350 OF 2022 PARTHA SARATHI TRIPATHY -VS- STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. For the Petitioner : Mr. Debdatta Saha, Mr. Subhamay Dewanji Mr. Saikat Biswas For the …
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2747/2017
ss CRR 2747 of 2017 With CRAN 1 of 2017 (Old CRAN 3511 of 2017) Vikash Agarwal & Anr. Vs. Ruchika Agarwal Mr. Ankit Agarwal … … for the opposite party 1. When the matter is called on for hearing, no representation is put forth on behalf of the petitioners. 2. The opposite
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2569/2017
Jks Ct. No.42 CRR 2569 of 2017 With CRAN 1 of 2017 (Old CRAN No.4260 of 2017) Braja Gopal Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. P. Karan Singh … … for the State 1. When the matter is called on for hearing, there is a conspicuous absence on the part of the petitioner, with no
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2145/2017
42 jks 29.07.2026 CRR 2145 of 2017 Nila Sen & Anr. Vs. Radha Raman Dutta & Anr. Mr. Nitish Sharma Ms. Sreyashee Mitra … … for the petitioners 1. Learned counsel on behalf of petitioners filed a written instruction of the petitioner no.1 Nila Sen and petitioner no.2
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/2626/2017
Jks Ct. No.42 CRR 2626 of 2017 Dr. Manas Kumar Banerjee Vs. Alauddin Mondal @ Ala & Anr. Mr. P. Karan Singh … … for the State 1. When the matter is called on for hearing, there is a conspicuous absence on behalf of the petitioner, with no representation being put forth to
Bench: Uday KumarCRR/3433/2022
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR CRR 3433 OF 2022 PRAKASH SHARMA -VS- M/S. VISION CELL (PVT.) LTD. For the Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Ld. Adv. Mr. Sovan Bera, Ld. Adv. Ms. Puja Beriwal, Ld. …
Bench: Rajarshi Bharadwaj, Uday KumarITAT/178/2026
13 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/178/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA VS M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE …
Bench: Rajarshi Bharadwaj, Uday KumarCUSTA/71/2026
SHEET CUSTA/71/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PORT KOLKATA VS M/S A.S. CHATTHA EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault