AB/31/2026 of Sanasam Ranjan Singh Vs Officer in Charge Lamphel Police Station
Bench: A.Guneshwar SharmaAB/31/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Crl. M.C. No. 40 of 2026 with
Filter precedents
2
Reset all
CourtsTotal 1
Decision period
Presiding judgeslatest 300
Manipur High Court — latest judgments
-
-
Crl.M.C./41/2026 of Akoijam Ibomcha Meitei Vs Officer in Charge Lamphel Police Station
Bench: A.Guneshwar SharmaCrl.M.C./41/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Crl. M.C. No. 41 of 2026 with
-
Crl.M.C./37/2026 of Sanasam Ranjan Singh Vs The Officer in Charge Lamphel Police Station
Bench: A.Guneshwar SharmaCrl.M.C./37/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Crl. M.C. No. 40 of 2026 with
-
WP(C)/666/2026 of Maringmei Makuchung and 4 Ors Vs State of Manipur and Anr
Bench: A.Guneshwar SharmaWP(C)/666/2026
THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 666 of 2026
-
WP(C)/405/2023 of Singam Priyokumar Meitei Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 4 ORS
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol SinghWP(C)/405/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP (C) No. 405 of 2023
-
BAIL APPLN./6/2025 of Asem Konungjao Singh Vs Officer in Charge, Khongjom Police Station
Bench: A.Guneshwar SharmaBAIL APPLN./6/2025
Bail Appln. No. 6 of 2025 Page 1 of 6
-
MC(Rev.Pet(J2))/3/2026 of Ranjan Yumnam Vs Nejolata Haobijam
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol Singh, A.Guneshwar SharmaMC(Rev.Pet(J2))/3/2026
Pet. (J2) No. 4 of 2026 with MC (Rev. Pet. (J2) No. 3 of 2026 Page 1 Item Nos.
-
MC(WP(C))/359/2026 of Union of India and Anr Vs Karam Dhamen Singh and 9 Ors
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol SinghMC(WP(C))/359/2026
COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C)) No. 359 of 2026 (Ref:- WP(C) No. 669 of
-
MC(CRP(CRP Art.227)/104/2025 of Wahengbam Inaocha Meetei Vs Irengbam Ongbi Lairenlakpam Ningol Sandhyarani Devi and another
MC(CRP(CRP Art.227)/104/2025
REPORTABLE Item Nos. 7-9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
-
MC(El.Pet.)/108/2022 of THONGAM BISWAJIT SINGH Vs SANGLAKPAM PRESHYOJIT SHARMA
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol SinghMC(El.Pet.)/108/2022
2022 with El.Pet. No. 27 of 2022 Page 1 Item No. 15-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault