Precedent

Showing 621–630 of more than 640 judgments, newest first 6.03 seconds

  • Punjab and Haryana High Court✕
  • Judge: Vikram Aggarwal✕
Filter precedents 2 Reset all

CourtsTotal 1

Decision period

All TimeLast 2 Years2020–20262010–2019

Presiding judgeslatest 300

Punjab and Haryana High Court — latest judgments

  1. Punjab and Haryana High Court 6 July 2026

    CRM-M/8275/2026 of KULDEEP KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

    Bench: Vikram AggarwalCRM-M/8275/2026

    THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.8275 of 2026 Date of Decision:-06.07.2026 Kuldeep Kaur …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet …

    View Full Judgment Save to My Vault
  3. Punjab and Haryana High Court 6 July 2026

    CRM-M/32650/2026 of SANDEEP SINGH @ SABI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB

    Bench: Vikram AggarwalCRM-M/32650/2026

    to conclude served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer. 5. Per contra long time to conclude and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer. Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the …..Petitioner will take a …

    View Full Judgment Save to My Vault
  4. Punjab and Haryana High Court 6 July 2026

    CRM-M/33332/2026 of RAJPAL @ DHOLU Vs STATE OF HARYANA

    Bench: Vikram AggarwalCRM-M/33332/2026

    COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 226 Rajpal @ Dholu State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik …

    View Full Judgment Save to My Vault
  5. Punjab and Haryana High Court 6 July 2026

    CRM-M/22551/2026 of JAVED HASAN @ KANJA Vs STATE OF HARYANA

    Bench: Vikram AggarwalCRM-M/22551/2026

    a sufficiently long time to conclude and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer. 5. Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail. She submits that co-accused Mubarik was erroneously granted bail and an …

    View Full Judgment Save to My Vault
  10. Punjab and Haryana High Court 6 July 2026

    CRM-M/33347/2026 of PAWANPREET @ BAGGA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB

    Bench: Vikram AggarwalCRM-M/33347/2026

    THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.33347 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 Pawanpreet alias Bagga …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the

    View Full Judgment Save to My Vault

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead