Filter results by 2

Courts

Judges in the latest 43

Years

Decided between

1950-01-01 and 1950-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

Supreme Court of India — latest judgments

1–10 of 43 judgments, newest first (0.24 seconds)

  1. PANNALAL JANKIDAS versus MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER.

    Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 43 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 979

    Case: PANNALAL JANKIDAS versus MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 979] (1950) Section: BODY 979 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS say that an apportionment under section 26 (2) would be meaningless, though, if the testator's estate was sufficiently solvent, it would have no …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

  2. GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 40 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 949 Cited by 1

    Case: GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 949] (1950) Section: BODY render any assistance to them. An omission to pro-vide for such relief in the Constitution cannot be h S C d · reme d1e [. d b ]y t e upreme ourt an assumption o jurisdiction which …

    Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

  3. V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS

    Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 41 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 961

    Case: V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 961] (1950) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 961 V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS. [SAIYID FAZL Au, MUKHERJEA and …

    Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

  4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL versus CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 39 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 1008

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL versus CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 1008] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 1008 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] 1950 of section 14, it seems to me, they would be bringing themselves under the bar of section 18 (2). The Patntalal …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

  5. EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY

    Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 42 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 969

    Case: EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 969] (1950) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 969 EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ] . K. DUBA.SH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

  6. STATE OF BOMBAY versus NAROTHAMDAS JETHABAI AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 20 December 1950 1950 INSC 38 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 51 Cited by 1

    Case: STATE OF BOMBAY versus NAROTHAMDAS JETHABAI AND ANOTHER [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 51] (1951) Section: BODY ' S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Orders passed by the Governor-General of India under the Indian Independence Act has still to be decided, I refrain from expressing any opinion …

    M. Patanjali Sastri

  7. JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE

    Supreme Court of India 14 December 1950 1950 INSC 37 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 940 Cited by 148

    Case: JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 940] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH • 1950 OhiranjitzaZ Ohowdhuri v. The Union of India and OthtJTS. DasJ. 1950 Dec. 14, 940 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] and their shareholders and has penalised this particular company …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

  8. CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 4 December 1950 1950 INSC 36 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 869 Cited by 758

    Case: CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 869] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 869 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA, C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MuKHERJEA …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

  9. THE STATE OF TRIPURA versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 4 December 1950 1950 INSC 35 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 1

    Case: THE STATE OF TRIPURA versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1951) Section: SECTION Supreme Court Reports VOL. II -1951 THE STATE OF TRIPURA v • THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA-INTERVENER [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania, M. Patanjali Sastri, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea and others

  10. RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY versus BAIJNATH BAJORIA.

    Supreme Court of India 1 December 1950 1950 INSC 33 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 840

    Case: RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY versus BAIJNATH BAJORIA. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 840] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 1950 Manann Lal Deas hi '· Mohammad Moi.nul Haque & Others. Patanjali Saatri J, 1950 Dec, 1. 840 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1950] thereafter. As pointed out by the Judicial …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead