Filter precedents
3
Reset allBench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: GANGA SARAN versus RAM CHARAN RAM GOPAL [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 36] (1952) Section: BODY 1951 Nov. J, 36 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1952} GANGA SARAN v. RAM CHARAN RAM GOPAL [HARILAL KANIA C.J., FAZL Au AND MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN JJ.] Indian Contract Act (/ of 1872)', s. 56--Contract for …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: THE STATE OF ORISSA versus MADAN GOPAL RUNGTA. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 28] (1952) Section: BODY October 25. THE STATE OF ORISSA ti. MADAN GOPAL RUNGTA. THE STATE OF ORISSA ti. ARJUN LADHA. THE STATE OF ORISSA ti. MALCOLM ANGUS TULLOCK. THE ST A TE OF ORISSA ti. MOHD. SERAJUDDIN …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: SRI SANKARI PRASAD SINGH DEO versus UNION OF INDIA AND STATE OF BIHAR [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 89] (1952) Section: SECTION Kharalripur on . the allegation _ that ·Taluk Kakwara · was alienable with "the consent of the Zami1c1dar. Ip our judgment the final conclusions arrived at by …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania, M. Patanjali Sastri, Sudhi Ranjan Das, N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar and others
Case: COLLECTOR OF BOMBAY versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 43] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS COLLECTOR OF BOMBAY v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS . . [HARILAL KANIA C.J., PATANJALI SASTRI …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: BHIM SEN FOR R. S. MALIK MATHRA DAS versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 18] (1952) Section: BODY 1951 Commi'ssWner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Finlay Mills Ltd. Kania.C. /. 1951 Oct. 4 18 expenditure. It was first held by him that the pay-ment in question was of a …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: JOYLAL AGARWALA versus THE STATE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 127] (1952) Section: BODY ~- Sant.bat MalttofJ .v. Kam/a P,ras1Jtl. Mukherjea /. JOYLAL AGARWALA t1. THE STATE 1951 UNION OF INDIA-Intervener. Oct. 4. BICHAN CHAND MORTA t1. THE STATE [HARILAL KANIA C. J., PATANJALI SAsTRI …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY versus FINLAY MILLS LTD. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 11] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS We are therefore of the opinion that it was a pan of the normal activtties of the assessee's business to earn money by making use of its …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: LOGENDRA NATH JHA & OTHERS versus SHRI POLAILAL BISWAS [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 676] (1951) Section: PARAGRAPH 1951 ManoharLal v. The State. Bose J. 1951 May 24 permfo his rival, who employs perhaps a dozen mctn-bers of his family, to rctnain open, dearly places the former at a …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: MANOHAR LAL versus THE STATE [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 671] (1951) Section: BODY 671 alienation made by the father within the period laid down in Article 125 of the Indian Limitation Act and it is only on the alienation being set aside that he is entitled to recover possession of …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: IN RE THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERWARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STAT... [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 747] (1951) Section: BODY a SUPREME COURT REPORTS In re THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERW ARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STATES …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault