Filter precedents
3
Reset allBench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus VIRKUMAR GULABCHAND SHAH [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 877] (1952) Section: PARAGRAPH :S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 11. That this defendant has nothing to do with ·the eight annas interest in the properties given in · schedule under than C and D relating to …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: GUR NARAIN DAS AND ANOTHER versus GUR TAHAL DAS AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 869] (1952) Section: BODY 869 the Sri Badrinath Temple Act. The other prayer of the plaintiffs is rejected. As the appeal succeeds in part and as it raised ques-tions of general importance with …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: THAKUR GOKALCHAND versus PARVIN KUMARI [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 825] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THAKUR GOKALCHAND ti. PARVIN KUMAR! [SAIYID FAzL Au and VMAN BosE JJ.] Punjab custom-Principles to be observed in dealing with .customary law stated-Essentials of …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: BHAGW AN SINGH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 812] (1952) Section: BODY 1952 April 30. SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1952] BHAGW AN SINGH fl. THE STATE OF PUNJAB [SAIYID FAzL Au and VIVIAN BoSE JJ.J Evidence Act (1 of 1872), secs. 145, 157-Criminal Procedure Code …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: LACHMAN SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 839] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS invoked by the · plaintiff, to the property held by a wife in her own right, the foundation on which custom grows would be wanting. When the matter is further …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: AMJAD KHAN versus THE STATE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 567] (1952) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS AMJADKHAN v. THE STATE [ SAIYID F AZL Au and VIVIAN BosE JJ.] Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), ss. 97, 102 and 105-Right of private defence-Reasonable apprehension of …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: RUBY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD versus PEAREY LAL KUMAR AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 501] (1952) Section: PARAGRAPH date of the agreement and having none he could not have transferred it. The mortgagor's possession was consequently not referable to the agreement. The · …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: DHIYAN SINGH AND ANOTHER versus JUGAL KISHORE AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 478] (1952) Section: SECTION 1952 Feb. 22. ti. DHIYAN SINGH AND ANOTHER JUGAL KISHORE AND ANOTHER. [SAIYAD FAZL Au and VIVIAN BosE JJ.] Arbitration-Award-"Malik Mustaqil", meaning of-Whe-ther …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: KASHINATH BHASKAR DATAR versus BHASKAR VISHWESHWAR KARVE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 491] (1952) Section: SECTION • S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS KASHINATH BHASKAR DATAR ti. BHASKAR VISHWESHW AR KARVE [SAIYID FAzL ALI and VMAN BosE JJ.] Indian Registration Act (XVI of 1908), s. …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: SURAJPAL SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 193] (1952) Section: BODY 1951 (excluding the plaintiff's) for the aggregate sum due as above and, in default of ·payment, limiting the liabilities of each item of property to the sum rateably due on it under …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault