Supreme Court of India — latest judgments

81. Supreme Court of India 20 December 1963 1963 INSC 267 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 91

    SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 91] (1964) Section: BODY • tained allegations only as regards 6 and not as regards the rest. This would mean that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to find that more than 6 votes had …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    38 Pages
82. Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 259 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047

    R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047] (1964) Section: SECTION 1047 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Jaw. It would, we think, be inappropriate for the High Court exercising its writ jurisdiction to consider the evidetice for …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    17 Pages
83. Supreme Court of India 9 December 1963 1963 INSC 250 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 880 • Cited by 1

    LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 880] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 880 [1964] 1963 issued. There can be little doubt that if a decision --of a quasi-judicial Tribunal is challenged before the Sri Rama Vilas …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    25 Pages
84. Supreme Court of India 6 December 1963 1963 INSC 248 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 801

    STATE OF GUJARAT versus JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar, K.N. Wanchoo

    Case: STATE OF GUJARAT versus JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 801] (1964) Section: FACTS SUPREME COURT REPORTS . STATE OF GUJARAT v. JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL (A.K. SARKAR AND K.N. WANCHOO, JJ.) Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), ss. 2l{l)(iv)(c), 92, 101-Dangerous …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    7 Pages
85. Supreme Court of India 2 December 1963 1963 INSC 238 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 590

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus JAMES ANDERSON

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus JAMES ANDERSON [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 590] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH [1964) 590 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1963 argument, in our opinion, is not well-conceived. The whole object of the Act is to save ignorant people Dr. Yash Pal from being …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    12 Pages
86. Supreme Court of India 25 November 1963 1963 INSC 233 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 560

    N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 560] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH (1964] 1963 pute must be governed by Rule S(a)(i) of the respon-dent's Standing Orders. Workmen of Dewan Tea In the result, we reverse the finding of the …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    9 Pages
87. Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 231 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 517 • Cited by 2

    THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 517] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS V. J. S. BASAPPA (A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J.C. SHAH, JJ.) Juri:Jdiction of Civil Courts-Statute conferring finality of …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    12 Pages
88. Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 230 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 508

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 508] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 508 SUPREME COURT REPORTS . [1964) 1963 the partners and therefore on him. The partnership agreement did not speak of market value or fair Jivarajbhai value. …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    9 Pages
89. Supreme Court of India 19 November 1963 1963 INSC 229 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 480 Followed in 3

    JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 480] (1964) Section: BODY I would therefore dismiss the appeal. 1963 ORDER R.P. Kapur Y. Union of India In accordance with the opinion of the majority and Anr. the appeal is allowed …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    28 Pages
90. Supreme Court of India 18 November 1963 1963 INSC 227 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 427

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB versus INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS

    Bench: A.K. Sarkar

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB versus INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 427] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB v. INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS (A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J.C. SHAH, JJ.) …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    5 Pages