Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: DHARMANAND PANT versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 321] (1957) Section: BODY 321 SUPREME COURT REPORTS S.C.R. to under s. 3 (3) may be disqualified from entertaining appeals from his own order, but that does not affect his power. to entertain· appeals from the …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas, Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: P. LAKSHMI REDDY versus L. LAKSHMI REDDY [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 195] (1957) Section: SECTION S.C.R. was· fired from the pistol Ex. III produced by the appellant from his house. There can, therefore, be no room for thinking, in the circumstances established ·in this case, that …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: KALUA versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 187] (1957) Section: BODY been set aside. But s. 100 in terms provides that if the Tribunal was of the opinion, as it was in this case, that the result of the election had been materially affected by the improper …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas, Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: RAJES KANTA ROY versus SANTI DEBI [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 77] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R. failed to provide the proper procedure for taking of the steps hereinabove indicated for finalising the electoral roll of ~he Municipality. If that was the true position the electoral roll …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: KARNANI PROPERTIES LTD. versus AUGUSTIN [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 20] (1957) Section: PARAGRAPH Fruit & Vege· tahle Merchants Union v Delhi Improve· ment Trust 1956 November g, 20 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [19571 the Control Act do not apply to the premises in ques-tion. That being so …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: FRUIT AND VEGETABLE MERCHANTS UNION versus DELHI IMPROVEMENT TRUST [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1957) Section: CONCLUSION THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS --------------------·------ FRUIT AND VEGETABLE MERCHANTS UNION ti. DELHI IMPROVEMENT TRUST (JAGANNAoHA1As, B. P. SrNHA and }AFER …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: DWARKA DASS BHATIA versus THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 948] (1956) Section: PARAGRAPH 1956 Raja Bahadu,. Motilal Poona Mills v. Tukaram Piraji Ma sale Govinda Menon J, 1956 November 1. 948 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1956] counsel for the appellant himself …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: BIPIN CHANDER JAISINGHBHAI SHAH versus PRABHAWATI. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 838] (1956) Section: CONCLUSION October 19. SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1956) BIPIN CHANDER JAISINGHBHAI SHAH v. PRABHAWATI. (JAGANNADHADAS, VENKATARAMA AYYAR and B. P. SINHA, JJ.] Husband and …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: IN RE: SHRI 'M', AN ADVOCATE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. versus - [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 811] (1956) Section: BODY Sll S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS which that Tribunal should have passed in this case, namely, that permission be granted to the appellant to discharge ninety six …
Bench: B. Jagannadhadas
Case: DEOKI NANDAN versus MURLIDHAR . [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 756] (1956) Section: PARAGRAPH 1956 Laxnii Devi Sugar Mills v. N and K ishore Singh BhagwatiJ. 1956 October 4 • 756 [1956] SUPREME COURT REPORTS lant to the respondent formed the basis of the enquiry which was held by the …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault