Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: J.L. Kapur
Case: BEKARU SINGH versus STATE OF U. P. [[1963] 1 S.C.R. 55] (1963) Section: PARAGRAPH 1 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS but that is the interpretation of the language of the various sections which are-relevant in the prf'sent case. Wa therefore aJlow the appeal, set aside the …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: CHAIRMAN OF THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONERS OF HOWRAH versus SHALIMAR WOOD PRODUCTS & ANOTHER. [[1963] 1 S.C.R. 47] (1963) Section: BODY 47 1 s.d.R. SUPREME OOURT REPOR'l4S CHAIRMAN OF THE MUNICIPAL COM-MISSIONERS OF HOWRAH v. SHALTMAR WOOD PRODUCTS & ANOTHER. (J. L. KAPUR, K. …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: THE STATE OF KERALA versus NARAYANI AMMA KAMALA DEVI [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 943] (1962) Section: BODY 3 s.c.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 943 some assistance in interpreting the word "mine" under section 2(a)(i). We must, therefore, hold that the Tribunal was right in coming to …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: DHARAM SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OJJ UTTAR PRADESH [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 769] (1962) Section: CONCLUSION iJ S.C.R. SUPREME COUR'l' REPoRTS DHARAM SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OJJ' UTTAR PRADESH (J. L. KAPUR, K. C. DAS GUPTA and RAGHUBAR DAYAL, JJ.) Criminal …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: PRATAPRAY MANMOHANDAS versus BOMBAY BULLION ASSOCIATION LTD. [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 541] (1962) Section: SECTION • a s.c.R. [SUPREl\lE ][COURT ][REPORTS ] ~ ' I 541 We therefore see no reason to interfere wor men. k [· ]·. t with the order of the tribunal in this respec · …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: SHAMBHOO versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 334] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH !~:!4 SUPREME COCR'f REPOitTS [l!lli2) SUPP. 1962 within the meaning- of the Act, then there can be Gond1.mog11la 101a.J)'O no qncsti.or_i of giving them the benefit of the Act. v. …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus LAXMAN JAIRAM [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 230] (1962) Section: CONCLUSION Ftbrua1y JG. 230 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1962] SUPP. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. LAXMAN JAIRAM J. L. KAPUR, K. C. DAs GUPTA and RAGHUBAR DAYAL, JJ.) Pro/iibition-Consumption of …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: KRISHAN LAL DHAWAN AND ·ANOTHER versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 209] (1962) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS be precluded from making the present appli-cation on the ground of res judicata. At the highest, a plea ofres judicata may perhaps be …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus SHAWKAR AND ANOTHER [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 213] (1962) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH v. SHAWKAR AND ANOTHER (J. L. KAPUR, K. C. DAS GUPTA and R~GHUB.Ut DAYAL, JJ.) Power of Appellate …
Bench: J.L. Kapur, A.K. Sarkar, Raghubar Dayal
Case: BANWARI versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 180] (1962) Section: BODY 191iZ 180 SUPRElm OOURT REPoRTS (1962] SOPP. BANWARI v. :::.TATE OF UTTAH PRADESH ( J. L. I\ APUR, A. K. SA1uu.u and i{AOHUBA/~ DAYAL, JJ.) <...:rimiu'!'I 1~rial-1'hret co1n.mitment …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault