Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: M. Hidayatullah, N. Rajagopala Ayyangar
Case: STATE OF UTIAR PRADESH versus SABIR ALI AND ANR. [[1964] 7 S.C.R. 435] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION STATE OF UTIAR PRADESH v. SABIR ALI AND ANR. [M. HIDAYATULLAH AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, JJ.] Criminal Trial- Offence under Uttar Pradesh Private Forests Act (VI of …
Bench: A.K. Sarkar, M. Hidayatullah, J.C. Shah
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR versus DALMIA INVESTMENT CO. LTD. [[1964] 7 S.C.R. 210] (1964) Section: BODY 1§61 March 1.3 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR v. DALMIA INVESTMENT CO. LTD. [AK. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J. C. SHAH, JJ.] ~ Income-tax …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah
Case: S.M.KARIM versus MST. BIBI SAKINA [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 780] (1964) Section: ISSUES Even so, learned counsel for the resflondent contended that in the view taken by the High Court it had become unnecessary for it to give its findings on two of the important issues that arose in …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah
Case: FADDI versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 312] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 312 1964 1964 of the provisions of the Act; and Art. 31 (2) deals with Jt4nt RaJn.aprova compulsory acquisition or requisition which also is entirely 1!~v• inapplicable to the present …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah
Case: V.N.VASUDEVA versus SETH KIRORIMAL LUHARIWALA [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 181] (1964) Section: BODY the second part of s. 304. In our opinion, the learned Judges 1964 who held that view and we say it respectfully fell into the Afrahlm Slwlkll common mtenllon w atever. error of …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah
Case: AFRAHIM SHEIKH AND OTHERS versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 172] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS AFRAHIM SHEIKH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL (M. HIDAYATULLAH AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL JJ.) Criminal Trial-Penal Code-Convictio11 under s. 304 Part …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah
Case: MOHD. IKRAM HUSSAIN versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 86] (1964) Section: SECTION [1964] J ,,...-, 86 SUPREME COURT RF.PORTS 1963 could reconsider the matter. Indeed, learned counsel for the first respondent conceded that fact. The .~red Yakooh appellant would …
Bench: M. Hidayatullah, K.C. Das Gupta
Case: HUKMA versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 708] (1964) Section: SECTION 1963 T. Devadasan v. The Union <Jf India and Another Subba Rao /. 1963 August • 708 These general observations made in the ·context of· admis-sions to college cannot, in my view, be applied in …
Bench: S.K. Das, P.B. Gajendragadkar, A.K. Sarkar, K.N. Wanchoo and others
Case: R. P. KAPUR versus PRATAP SINGH KAIRON AND OTHERS [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 224] (1964) Section: SECTION 1963 R. P. Kapur v. Pratap Singh Kairon and Otht:rs Das Gupta J. 1963 Aug11st, 2 224 the Inquiries Act would amount to contempt of the crimi-nal court, we are clearly of opinion …
Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, S.K. Das, P.B. Gajendragadkar, A.K. Sarkar and others
Case: IN RE. THE BILL TO AMEND S. 20 OF THB SEA CUSTOMS ACT, 1878, AND S. 3 OF THE CENTRAL EXCISES AND SA... [[1964] 3 S.C.R. 787] (1964) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 787 We are of opinion that the order of the High Court is correct and therefore dismiss the …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault