Supreme Court of India — latest judgments

61. Supreme Court of India 5 May 1952 1952 INSC 27 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 1056

    RAJA SURIYA PAL SINGH versus THE STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: RAJA SURIYA PAL SINGH versus THE STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1056] (1952) Section: CONCLUSION May 2, 5. SUPREME COURT REPORTS RAJA SURIYA PAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER (AND OTHER CASES) [PATANJALI SASTR! C.J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    34 Pages
62. Supreme Court of India 5 May 1952 1952 INSC 28 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 889 Followed in 65

    THE STATE OF BIHAR versus MAHARAJADHIRAJA SIR KAMESHWAR SINGH OF DARBHANGA AND OTHERS

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus MAHARAJADHIRAJA SIR KAMESHWAR SINGH OF DARBHANGA AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 889] (1952) Section: BODY the learned English Judges in the first tea case would not be without relevance on the question of sentence in many cases of this kind. There …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    126 Pages
63. Supreme Court of India 2 May 1952 1952 INSC 26 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 1020 • Cited by 1

    VISWESHWAR RAO versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: VISWESHWAR RAO versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1020] (1952) Section: BODY 1952 1020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS VISWESHW AR RAO v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (AND OTHER CASES) [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA, DAs and CHANDRASEKHARA …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    34 Pages
64. Supreme Court of India 25 April 1952 1952 INSC 24 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 645

    JOSHI GIRJADHARJI AND ANOTHER versus LACHMANJI PANTH AND OTHERS.

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: JOSHI GIRJADHARJI AND ANOTHER versus LACHMANJI PANTH AND OTHERS. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 645] (1952) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS JOSHI GIRJADHARJI AND ANOTHER v. LACHMANJI PANTH AND OTHERS. [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, MuKHERJEA and DAs JJ.] U. P. …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    9 Pages
65. Supreme Court of India 31 March 1952 1952 INSC 19 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 597 Followed in 32

    STATE OF MADRAS versus V. G. ROW

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: STATE OF MADRAS versus V. G. ROW [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 597] (1952) Section: BODY For the reasons given above, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court set aside. Each party will bear their own costs of these proceedings through-out. Appeal allowed. Agent for the …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    15 Pages
66. Supreme Court of India 27 March 1952 1952 INSC 18 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 612 Followed in 1

    DATTATREYA MORESHWAR PANGARKAR versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: DATTATREYA MORESHWAR PANGARKAR versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 612] (1952) Section: BODY 1952 . Maret.. 27. ·612 :SUPREME. COURT REPORTS [1952] DATTATREYA MORESHWAR PANGARKAR v. THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., MEHER CHAND …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    33 Pages
67. Supreme Court of India 17 March 1952 1952 INSC 15 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 583 Followed in 39

    VEERAPPA PILLAI versus RAMAN & RAMAN LTD. AND OTHERS.

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: VEERAPPA PILLAI versus RAMAN & RAMAN LTD. AND OTHERS. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 583] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.E,. SUPREME COURT REPORTS VEERAPPA PILLAI "· RAMAN & RAMAN LTD. and OTHERS. [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA, DAs and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.] …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    15 Pages
68. Supreme Court of India 27 February 1952 1952 INSC 10 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 435 Followed in 41

    KATHI RANING RAWAT versus THE STATE OF SAURASHTRA

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: KATHI RANING RAWAT versus THE STATE OF SAURASHTRA [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 435] (1952) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS S.C.R. bona fide, even if good faith can be held to be a defence at all in a proceeding for contempt. What is more, he did not express any regret for what he …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    40 Pages
69. Supreme Court of India 27 February 1952 1952 INSC 11 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 572 Followed in 2

    MOHAMMAD YASIN versus THE TOWN AREA COMMITTEE, JALALABAD AND ANOTHER

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: MOHAMMAD YASIN versus THE TOWN AREA COMMITTEE, JALALABAD AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 572] (1952) Section: PARAGRAPH 572 [1952] 1952 1952 on the doors were not the isolated acts of a few scattered individuals. It was the mob that was doing Amjad Khan v. it .and in the High …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    11 Pages
70. Supreme Court of India 14 February 1952 1952 INSC 6 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 425

    BATHINA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY versus THE STATE OF MADRAS.

    Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri

    Case: BATHINA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY versus THE STATE OF MADRAS. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 425] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS BATHINA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY v. THE STATE OF MADRAS. [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, Muui:ERJEA, DAs and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR· AIYAR· …

    View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

    11 Pages