Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: JAIKRISHNADAS MANOHARDAS DESAI AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 319] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPRE.l.VIE COURT REPORTS 319 delivery of possession of the jagir, or a writ directing z96° commutation otherwise than under the provisions of …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus HAFIZ MOHAMMAD ISMAIL AND HAFIZ JAWED ALI [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 911] (1960) Section: FACTS S.C .. R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 911 fact as the utilisation of a portion of the reserve as working capital has to be proved by the employer by evidence …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: CHAMPALAL versus MST. SAMARATH BAI [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 810] (1960) Section: BODY 810 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(2)] r96o the competence of the arbitrators. The High Court ., Ai-·r , din appeal under the Letters Patent, did confirm the ""/S. a?td sans. opi arsna Ltd. or d er …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: CHATURBHAI M. PATEL versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 362] (1960) Section: BODY 362 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] '959 In those circumstances, the trial under s. 339 was held The State to be bad. We are not concerned in the present case v. with s. …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: THE STATE versus HIRALAL G. KOTHARI AND OTHERS [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 355] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION • S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 355 THE STATE 'I.'. HIRALAL G. KOTHARI AND OTHERS (JAFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, and K. N. WANCHOO, JJ.) Criminal Law-Pardon-Conspiracy and ·allied …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: N. R. GROSE ALIAS NIKHIL RANJAN GROSE versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 58] (1960) Section: SECTION I959 October 27. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] N. R. GROSE alias NIKHIL RANJAN GROSE v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL (JAFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, A. K. SARKAR and …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF versus MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTWALA AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 749] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF v. MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTVI ALA AND ANOTHER (SYED JAFER IMAM and K. N. WANCHOO, JJ.) …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: CHIMANLAL PREMCHAND versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 764] (1960) Section: SECTION 764 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] r959 was a graver offence; sometimes involving the security J ethanand Bet ab of the State, and so an amendment was introduced in v. 1949 …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: JETHANAND BETAB versus THE STATE OF DELHI [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 755] (1960) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 755 In this appeal this Court can do what the High r959 Court could have done. We accordtngly allow the Abdul Rehman appeal and set aside the order of …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus HIRALAL KEJRIWAL AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 726] (1960) Section: BODY 726 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)) r959 s. 25E of the Act. It was conceded on behalf the , .-d respondent workmen that the lay-off in the factory was nsso"ate Cement d 1 f l' …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault