Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: THE SUGAULI SUGAR WORKS (PRIVATE) LTD. versus THE ASSTT. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 804] (1962) Section: BODY Ma,ch l·l. S04 SUPREME COURT H.EPOHTs [i962] SUPP. THE SUGAULI SUGAli WORK') (PltIVATE) LTD. v. THE ASSTT. HEGISTRAl1, 00-0PERATJ\'E …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: MOHAN SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 848] (1962) Section: SECTION 1962 Orisso CtmmJ Lttl. v. Uni0tt of lrutia AfyarJ. 19&t Mo1d114 t ' r 848 SUl'l\E.ME COlJRT l{EPORTS [Hlli2J t ' SUPP. r be said to be reasonable and must be struck down as not falling …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: BOKARO AND RAMGUR LTD. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 831] (1962) Section: SECTION r 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 831 Besides; the containers are produced only for the ; use of the Mills. They are not intended to be sold in the market at …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: BACHHITTAR SINGH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 713] (1962) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS BACHHITTAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB (B. P. SINHA, c. J., K. SUBBA RAO, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAB, J. R. MUDHOLKAB and T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAB, JJ.) …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: KEWAL KRISHAN versus STATE OF PUNJAB [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 613] (1962) Section: BODY is oolonrable and not bona fide, s. 25G has no application and the respondents, therefore, are not entitled to any relief under that section. In the result the appeal is allow0d, the …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: THE MANAGEMENT OF INDIAN CABLE CO., LTD., CALCUTTA versus ITS WORKMEN [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 589] (1962) Section: BODY been paid on the basis of the trading results of the previous year and depended upon the profits earned in the previous year. In the .oircumstances it …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: STATE OF ASSAM versus TULSI SINGH [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 508] (1962) Section: CONCLUSION 508 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1962] SUPP. STATE OF ASSA~f v. TULSI SINGH (B.P. Sr:nIA, c .. J., K. SusBA RAO N. ltA.JAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J. R. MuDHOLKAR and T. L. VF.NKATAR~MA AIYAR, JJ.) …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: R. C. JALL versus UNION OF INDIA [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 436] (1962) Section: BODY 1962 8, S. Jfunno 1..~l v. 8. 8. Rajk.,.., Slid. J, IY~2 Fth1uary 21. 436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1002] SUPP· as property. The High Court was therefore, in our judgment, in error in holding …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER versus ARVIND N. MAFATLAL [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 455] (1962) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 'I! ARVIND N. MAFATLAL (B. P. SINHA, c. J., K. SUBBA RAO, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J. R. MUDHOLKAR and T. L. VENKATARAMA …
Bench: T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
Case: AMARSARJIT SINGH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB (AND CONNECTED PETITIONS AND APPEALS) [[1962] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 346] (1962) Section: BODY Ifft Ft6rum 20. 346 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1962] SUPP. AMARSARJIT SINGH v. THE STATE OF PUN.JAR (AND CONNECTED PETITION'S AND APPEALS) (B. P. …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault