Showing 1–8 of 8 judgments, newest first 0.09 seconds

  • Decided 1950✕
  • Judge: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea✕
Filter precedents 2 Reset all

CourtsTotal 1

Decision period

Presiding judgeslatest 8

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 40 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 949 • Cited by 1

    GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS.

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 949] (1950) Section: BODY render any assistance to them. An omission to pro-vide for such relief in the Constitution cannot be h S C d · reme d1e [. d b ]y t e upreme ourt an assumption o jurisdiction which …

    12 Pages
  2. Supreme Court of India 21 December 1950 1950 INSC 41 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 961

    V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 961] (1950) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 961 V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS. [SAIYID FAZL Au, MUKHERJEA and …

    8 Pages
  3. Supreme Court of India 4 December 1950 1950 INSC 35 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 1

    THE STATE OF TRIPURA versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA

    Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania, M. Patanjali Sastri, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Sir Syed Fazl Ali and others

    Case: THE STATE OF TRIPURA versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1951) Section: SECTION Supreme Court Reports VOL. II -1951 THE STATE OF TRIPURA v • THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA-INTERVENER [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI …

    50 Pages
  4. Supreme Court of India 30 November 1950 1950 INSC 31 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 799

    SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 799] (1950) Section: BODY r\ S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 799 SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS v. THE STATE OF BIHAR. [SAIYID FAZL ALI, MUKHERJEA and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.J Bihar Sales Tax Act (VI of 1944), s. …

    7 Pages
  5. Supreme Court of India 14 November 1950 1950 INSC 28 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 766

    RAM GOPAL versus NAND LAL AND OTHERS

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: RAM GOPAL versus NAND LAL AND OTHERS [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 766] (1950) Section: BODY (1950] 766 SUI'REM:E COURT RE.PORTS that the impugned statute does not stand the test of reasonableness and is therefore void. 1950 Chi.'IJ-tama:n Rao v. Rao v. The result therefore is that the …

    15 Pages
  6. Supreme Court of India 17 October 1950 1950 INSC 26 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 821 • Cited by 2

    MOHINDER SINGH versus THE STATE

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: MOHINDER SINGH versus THE STATE [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 821] (1950) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 821 saleable interest or interest as a tenant, ryot or under-1950 tenure holder. S.ri Rt'lnga I agree in the conclusion reached by my learned N.tayam Rama brother. …

    13 Pages
  7. Supreme Court of India 17 October 1950 1950 INSC 25 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 806

    SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO versus KANDOKOLU CHELLA Y AMMA ALIAS MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER

    Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

    Case: SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO versus KANDOKOLU CHELLA Y AMMA ALIAS MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 806] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 806 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] 1950 SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO v. Oot. l't, KANDOKOlU CHELLA Y AMMA alias MANGAMMA AND …

    16 Pages
  8. Supreme Court of India 14 March 1950 1950 INSC 2 [1950] 1 S.C.R. 25

    BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD. versus GOURISHANKARSHARMA

    Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea and others

    Case: BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD. versus GOURISHANKARSHARMA [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 25] (1950) Section: BODY ,, S.C.R. SUPREME COUR1' REPORTS the octroi duty under the Municipal Act continues to be valid. On this point again the appellant's argu-ment is that the levy of a …

    5 Pages

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead