Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: PANNALAL JANKIDAS versus MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 979] (1950) Section: BODY 979 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS say that an apportionment under section 26 (2) would be meaningless, though, if the testator's estate was sufficiently solvent, it would have no …
Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea
Case: GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 949] (1950) Section: BODY render any assistance to them. An omission to pro-vide for such relief in the Constitution cannot be h S C d · reme d1e [. d b ]y t e upreme ourt an assumption o jurisdiction which …
Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea
Case: V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 961] (1950) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 961 V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS. [SAIYID FAZL Au, MUKHERJEA and …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL versus CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 1008] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 1008 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] 1950 of section 14, it seems to me, they would be bringing themselves under the bar of section 18 (2). The Patntalal …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 969] (1950) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 969 EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ] . K. DUBA.SH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: STATE OF BOMBAY versus NAROTHAMDAS JETHABAI AND ANOTHER [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 51] (1951) Section: BODY ' S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Orders passed by the Governor-General of India under the Indian Independence Act has still to be decided, I refrain from expressing any opinion …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 940] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH • 1950 OhiranjitzaZ Ohowdhuri v. The Union of India and OthtJTS. DasJ. 1950 Dec. 14, 940 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] and their shareholders and has penalised this particular company …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 869] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 869 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA, C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MuKHERJEA …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania, M. Patanjali Sastri, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Sir Syed Fazl Ali and others
Case: THE STATE OF TRIPURA versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1951) Section: SECTION Supreme Court Reports VOL. II -1951 THE STATE OF TRIPURA v • THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL UNION OF INDIA-INTERVENER [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI …
Bench: Harilal Jekisundas Kania
Case: RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY versus BAIJNATH BAJORIA. [[1950] 1 S.C.R. 840] (1950) Section: PARAGRAPH 1950 Manann Lal Deas hi '· Mohammad Moi.nul Haque & Others. Patanjali Saatri J, 1950 Dec, 1. 840 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1950] thereafter. As pointed out by the Judicial …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault