All courts — latest judgments

21. JOYLAL AGARWALA versus THE STATE

    Supreme Court of India 4 October 1951 1951 INSC 44 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 127

    Case: JOYLAL AGARWALA versus THE STATE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 127] (1952) Section: BODY ~- Sant.bat MalttofJ .v. Kam/a P,ras1Jtl. Mukherjea /. JOYLAL AGARWALA t1. THE STATE 1951 UNION OF INDIA-Intervener. Oct. 4. BICHAN CHAND MORTA t1. THE STATE [HARILAL KANIA C. J., PATANJALI SAsTRI …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

22. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY versus FINLAY MILLS LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 1 October 1951 1951 INSC 43 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 11

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY versus FINLAY MILLS LTD. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 11] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS We are therefore of the opinion that it was a pan of the normal activtties of the assessee's business to earn money by making use of its …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

23. HARLA versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

    Supreme Court of India 24 September 1951 1951 INSC 42 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 110 Cited by 4

    Case: HARLA versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 110] (1952) Section: BODY 1951 Sept. 24. SUPREME COURT REPORTS HARLA ti. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN and V1v1AN BosE JJ.J Jaipur Laws Act, 1923, .<. 3 (b)-faipur Opium Act, 1923-Laa, Passed by Council of …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan, Vivian Bose

24. COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFIT TAX BOMBAY CITY versus SRI LAKSHMI SILK MILLS LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 18 September 1951 1951 INSC 41 [1952] 1 S.C.R. 1

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFIT TAX BOMBAY CITY versus SRI LAKSHMI SILK MILLS LTD. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1952) Section: CONCLUSION The Supreme Court Reports. COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFIT TAX BOMBAY CITY v. SRI LAKSHMI SILK MILLS LTD. [ SAIYID FAZL ALI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN AND …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Sir Syed Fazl Ali

25. AS/45/1950 of NARAYANA PILLAI Vs CENTRAL BANKING CORPORATION OF TRAVANCORE LTD

    Kerala High Court 6 June 1951

    g}-1 Ceurt @f Judicature,/ Tre:irance re-Cochin. 6tli day @f Jmrn 1951. Bef@re His I.=rdship t:he £-wn 'bl(: llr. C. Kunhi R:-'lm.an, Chief Justice a.nd His Lordship the Hon'5le ±r. Justice V.I. Joseph. Auneal Suit m~ .45/1:150. Appellants: - defendants 4 anl 7: 1. lfaraya.na …

26. TARA SINGH versus THE STATE

    Supreme Court of India 1 June 1951 1951 INSC 40 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 729 Cited by 141

    Case: TARA SINGH versus THE STATE [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 729] (1951) Section: SECTION appears to have been instituted to test the validity of a controversial measure and to secure a final decision on it to set at rest the doubts and uncertainties which may have clouded the minds of a …

    M. Patanjali Sastri

27. THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER versus F. N. BALSARA

    Supreme Court of India 25 May 1951 1951 INSC 39 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 682 Cited by 294

    Case: THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER versus F. N. BALSARA [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 682] (1951) Section: BODY !951 May 25. THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER v. F. N. BALSARA F. N. BALSARA v. THE STA TE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER [SA1Ym FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SAsTRI, MUKHERJEA, S. R. DAs and …

    M. Patanjali Sastri

28. LOGENDRA NATH JHA & OTHERS versus SHRI POLAILAL BISWAS

    Supreme Court of India 24 May 1951 1951 INSC 38 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 676

    Case: LOGENDRA NATH JHA & OTHERS versus SHRI POLAILAL BISWAS [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 676] (1951) Section: PARAGRAPH 1951 ManoharLal v. The State. Bose J. 1951 May 24 permfo his rival, who employs perhaps a dozen mctn-bers of his family, to rctnain open, dearly places the former at a …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

29. MANOHAR LAL versus THE STATE

    Supreme Court of India 23 May 1951 1951 INSC 37 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 671

    Case: MANOHAR LAL versus THE STATE [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 671] (1951) Section: BODY 671 alienation made by the father within the period laid down in Article 125 of the Indian Limitation Act and it is only on the alienation being set aside that he is entitled to recover possession of …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania

30. IN RE THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERWARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STATES (LAWS) ACT, 1950 versus REFERENCE CASE

    Supreme Court of India 23 May 1951 1951 INSC 36 [1951] 1 S.C.R. 747 Cited by 1

    Case: IN RE THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERWARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STAT... [[1951] 1 S.C.R. 747] (1951) Section: BODY a SUPREME COURT REPORTS In re THE DELHI LAWS ACT, 1912, THE AJMER-MERW ARA (EXTENSION OF LAWS) ACT, 1947 AND THE PART C STATES …

    Harilal Jekisundas Kania