Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus SHAILABALA DEVI [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 654] (1952) Section: PARAGRAPH The result, therefore, 1s that this appeal must stand dismissed with costs. Appeal dismissed. Agent for the appellants : C. P. Lall. Agent for the respondents : N atmit Lall. 1952 May …
Bench: Mehr Chand Mahajan
Case: THE UNION OF INDIA versus HIRA DEVI AND ANOTHER. [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 765] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS PATANJALI SAsTRr J.-I concur in the order propos-ed by my learned brother Chandrasekhara Aiyar J. DAs J.-In view of the ma=ority decision in Case No. 22 …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: LACHMANDAS KEW ALRAM AHUJA AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 710] (1952) Section: BODY 1952 MRy 20 710 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1952] LACHMANDAS KEW ALRAM AHUJA AND ANOTHER fl. THE STATE OF BOMBAY. [PATANJALI SAsTRI C.J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: GUR NARAIN DAS AND ANOTHER versus GUR TAHAL DAS AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 869] (1952) Section: BODY 869 the Sri Badrinath Temple Act. The other prayer of the plaintiffs is rejected. As the appeal succeeds in part and as it raised ques-tions of general importance with …
Bench: Sir Syed Fazl Ali
Case: THAKUR GOKALCHAND versus PARVIN KUMARI [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 825] (1952) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THAKUR GOKALCHAND ti. PARVIN KUMAR! [SAIYID FAzL Au and VMAN BosE JJ.] Punjab custom-Principles to be observed in dealing with .customary law stated-Essentials of …
Bench: Bijan Kumar Mukherjea
Case: NAR HARI SASTRI AND OTHERS versus SHRI BADRINATH TEMPLE COMMITTEE [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 849] (1952) Section: BODY _..,. SUPREME COURT REPORTS NAR HARi SASTRI AND OTHERS v. SHRI BADRINATH TEMPLE COMMITTEE. [SAIYAD FAZL ALI J., MuKHERJEA and DAs JJ.] Hindu law-Religious …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Sudhi Ranjan Das and others
Case: GURBACHAN SINGH versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 737] (1952) Section: BODY direct that they be tried for the offences alleged to have been committed by them according to law and in the meantime they be retained in custody as undertrial prisoners. …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: RAJA SURIYA PAL SINGH versus THE STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1056] (1952) Section: CONCLUSION May 2, 5. SUPREME COURT REPORTS RAJA SURIYA PAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER (AND OTHER CASES) [PATANJALI SASTR! C.J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus MAHARAJADHIRAJA SIR KAMESHWAR SINGH OF DARBHANGA AND OTHERS [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 889] (1952) Section: BODY the learned English Judges in the first tea case would not be without relevance on the question of sentence in many cases of this kind. There …
Bench: M. Patanjali Sastri
Case: VISWESHWAR RAO versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1020] (1952) Section: BODY 1952 1020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS VISWESHW AR RAO v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (AND OTHER CASES) [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA, DAs and CHANDRASEKHARA …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault