All courts — latest judgments

41. THE EDWARD MILLS CO. LTD., BEAWAR, AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF AJMER AND ANOTHER.

    Supreme Court of India 14 October 1954 1954 INSC 91 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 735 Cited by 144

    Case: THE EDWARD MILLS CO. LTD., BEAWAR, AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF AJMER AND ANOTHER. [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 735] (1955) Section: BODY _735 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS The Australian Constitution indeed has no provision like article 19(1) (g) of the Indian Constitution and it is …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Vivian Bose and others

42. BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. versus THE STATE OF AJMER

    Supreme Court of India 14 October 1954 1954 INSC 92 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 752 Cited by 8

    Case: BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. versus THE STATE OF AJMER [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 752] (1955) Section: BODY 75:2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1955] BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. v. THE STATE OF AJMER. [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN C. J., MuKHERJEA, VIVIAN BosE, JAGANNADHADAS and VENKATARAMA AYYAR JJ.) …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

43. SAGHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE OF U. P. AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 13 October 1954 1954 INSC 90 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 707 Cited by 938

    Case: SAGHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE OF U. P. AND OTHERS. [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 707] (1955) Section: BODY · S.C.R. The learned Attorney-General argued that Ram Narain was a native Indian subject of Her Majesty before the 15th August, 1947, and that description continued to apply to …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

44. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus RAM NARAIN

    Supreme Court of India 12 October 1954 1954 INSC 88 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 697 Cited by 5

    Case: CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus RAM NARAIN [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 697] (1955) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS which declares that none of the provlSlons of the specified Acts shall be deemed to be void or ever to have become void on the ground of the alleged violation of …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

45. THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus BHANJI MUNJI AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 12 October 1954 1954 INSC 89 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 777 Cited by 15

    Case: THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus BHANJI MUNJI AND ANOTHER [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 777] (1955) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS was not binding and could not be enforced. Whatever be the merits of such a contention, it obviously cannot be raised in an application made under …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

46. DHIRUBHA DEVISINGH GOHIL versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY.

    Supreme Court of India 11 October 1954 1954 INSC 87 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 691 Cited by 1

    Case: DHIRUBHA DEVISINGH GOHIL versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY. [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 691] (1955) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 691 that condition 4(a) and special condition 3 expressed as they are at present are void and have 110 legal effect as against the fundamental right …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

47. KUNJILAL AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH.

    Supreme Court of India 8 October 1954 1954 INSC 86 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 872

    Case: KUNJILAL AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 872] (1955) Section: PARAGRAPH 1954 .Anderson Wright Ltd. •• Moran aii.d Company. Mukherjea ]. 1954 October 8. 872 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [19551 to the arbitration agreement. If the Court 1s of …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

48. ZAVERBHAI AMAIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 8 October 1954 1954 INSC 85 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 799 Cited by 64

    Case: ZAVERBHAI AMAIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 799] (1955) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ZA VERBHAI AMAIDAS v. ""· THE STATE OF BOMBAY [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN C.J., MuKHERJEA, VIVIAN BosE, JAGANNADHADAS and VENKATARAMA AYYAR J J.] Constitution of …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan

49. R. M. SESHADRI versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TANJORE, AND ANOTHER.

    Supreme Court of India 1 October 1954 1954 INSC 84 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 686 Cited by 7

    Case: R. M. SESHADRI versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TANJORE, AND ANOTHER. [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 686] (1955) Section: BODY R. M. SESHADRI 19:;4 October I. ti. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TANJORE, AND ANOTHER. [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN C. J., MuKHERJEA, S. R. DAs, VIVIAN BosE and GHULAM HASSAN …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea, Sudhi Ranjan Das and others

50. IN RE HIRA LAL DIXIT AND TWO OTHERS versus -

    Supreme Court of India 1 October 1954 1954 INSC 83 [1955] 1 S.C.R. 677 Cited by 3

    Case: IN RE HIRA LAL DIXIT AND TWO OTHERS versus - [[1955] 1 S.C.R. 677] (1955) Section: PARAGRAPH On a consideration of the relevant provisions of the Act and the rules and the arguments advanced before us we are of opinion that the appellant cannot in the circumstances of this …

    Mehr Chand Mahajan