Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: P. L. LAKHANPAL versus THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1101] (1955) Section: BODY 2S.C.R. neither the Act nor the rules framed thereunder define those departments. If the nomenclature only matt-·ered, then there is no escape from the conclusion that …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: A.THANGAL KUNJU MUSALIAR versus M. VENKITACHALAM.POTTI AND ANOTHER [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1196] (1955) Section: SECTION J '( ' 1955 Willie {W.1liam) Sl1m9 .v. The Stattof Madhya Pradesh Imam J. 1955 December 20. - 1196 : , SUPREME· COURT· REPORTS .· [1955] obeyed Contravention …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: M.CT.MUTHIAH & 2 OTHERS versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS &, ANOTHER [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1247] (1955) Section: BODY ·1247 this purpose in juxta-position with section 47 of. the Travancore Act XXIII of 1121 cannot be held to be discriminatory and violative of the …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: THE UNION OF INDIA versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1076] (1955) Section: PARAGRAPH 1955 Rajalzmundry Eketric Supp/;! Corporation Ltd. v. A· Nageswara Rao and others 1076 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1955] appointed to manage its …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: THAKUR PRATAP SINGH versus SHRI KRISHNA GUPTA AND OTHERS. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1029] (1955) Section: BODY 2S.C.R. power of pardon thereunder is different from "per-sonal rights, privileges and dignities" which have been dealt with under articles XVI and XVII in the fol- lowing …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: THAIVALAPPIL KUNJUVARU VAREED versus THE STATE OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1022] (1955) Section: SECTION Dec1mh1r 1. [1955] THAIVALAPPIL KUNJUVARU VAREED fl. THE STATE OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN. l S. R. DAs, AcTING C. J., VIVIAN BosE, BHAGWATI, JAGANNADHADAS and B. …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: SHRIMATI VIDYA VERMA, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND R>V>S MANI versus DR. SHIV NARAIN VERMA. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 983] (1955) Section: BODY 2S.C.R. ment before us that those rights are sought to be agitated. Under the circumstances, we must decline to consider them. It will be …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: WILLIE (WILLIAM) SLANEY versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1140] (1955) Section: BODY 1955 Indira Solumlal v. Custodian of Evacute Propm,, Delhi and others Jagannadhadas J. [1955] The appeal is allowed and the order of the Custodian-General is set aside. …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: MATAJOG DOBEY versus H. C. BHARI [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 925] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION MATAJOG DOBEY v. H. C. BHARI (WITH CONNECTED APPEAL) [S. R. DAs, AcT!NG C.J., VIVIAN BosE, JAGANNADHA-DAS, JAFER IMAM and CHANDRASEKHARA A1YAR JJ.] Constitution of India, Art. 14--Criminal …
Bench: Sudhi Ranjan Das
Case: SADHU RAM versus THE CUSTODIAN-GENERAL OF EVACUEE PROPERTY [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1113] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION For the reasons aforesaid it must be held that there ts no merit in the application and the rule is accord-ingly discharged, and the application is dismissed. SADHU …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault