Filter results by 1
Courts
Judges in the latest 100
- Sudhi Ranjan Das33
- Vivian Bose27
- Bijan Kumar Mukherjea11
- Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati8
- N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar5
- T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar3
- B. Jagannadhadas2
- Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha2
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
21–30 of 100 judgments, newest first (0.08 seconds)
-
IN THE MATTER OF AN ADVOCATE OF THE SUPREME COURT. • versus .
Supreme Court of India 23 November 1955 1955 INSC 67 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 1006 Cited by 2
Case: IN THE MATTER OF AN ADVOCATE OF THE SUPREME COURT. • versus . [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1006] (1955) Section: PARAGRAPH 1955 CorPcration of Calcutta v. Mule hand Agarwal/a Venkatarama Ayyar J. 1955 November 23. 1006 [1955] SUPREME COURT REPORTS were it not that the appellant …
Bijan Kumar Mukherjea
-
CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA versus MULCHAND AGARWALLA.
Supreme Court of India 17 November 1955 1955 INSC 66 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 995 Cited by 1
Case: CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA versus MULCHAND AGARWALLA. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 995] (1955) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS CORPORATION OF CALCUTT A fl. MULCHAND AGARWALLA. AYYAR and JAFER IMAM JJ.] [VENKATARAMA Calcutta Mtmicipal Act, 1923, (Bengal Act III of 1923), ss. 363, 488 …
T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar
-
SHRIMATI VIDYA VERMA, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND R>V>S MANI versus DR. SHIV NARAIN VERMA.
Supreme Court of India 11 November 1955 1955 INSC 65 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 983 Cited by 13
Case: SHRIMATI VIDYA VERMA, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND R>V>S MANI versus DR. SHIV NARAIN VERMA. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 983] (1955) Section: BODY 2S.C.R. ment before us that those rights are sought to be agitated. Under the circumstances, we must decline to consider them. It will be …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
RAJ BAHADUR KANWAR RAJ NATH AND OTHERS versus PRAMOD C. BHATT, CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY.
Supreme Court of India 10 November 1955 1955 INSC 64 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 977 Cited by 2
Case: RAJ BAHADUR KANWAR RAJ NATH AND OTHERS versus PRAMOD C. BHATT, CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 977] (1955) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS RAJ BAHADUR KANWAR RAJ NATH AND OTHERS v. PRAMOD C. BHATT, CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY. I LB. K. MuKHERJEA C. …
Bijan Kumar Mukherjea
-
BRAJNANDAN SINHA versus JYOTI NARAIN
Supreme Court of India 8 November 1955 1955 INSC 63 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 955 Cited by 49
Case: BRAJNANDAN SINHA versus JYOTI NARAIN [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 955] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS BRAJNANDAN SINHA v. JYOTI NARAIN. [BHAGWATI, B. P. SINHA and JAFER IMAM JJ.] Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850 (XXXVII of 1850)-A Commissioner appointed …
Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati
-
MERLA RAMANNA versus NALLAPARAJU AND OTHERS.
Supreme Court of India 4 November 1955 1955 INSC 62 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 938 Cited by 25
Case: MERLA RAMANNA versus NALLAPARAJU AND OTHERS. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 938] (1955) Section: BODY 1955 Matajog Dobey v. H. C. B/UJri Chandrast/chara Ai1ar ]. 1955 938 SUPREME COURT REPORTS plaint took the view that there was no use in pro-ceeding against him alone, as the main …
Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati
-
WILLIE (WILLIAM) SLANEY versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH.
Supreme Court of India 31 October 1955 1955 INSC 60 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 1140 Cited by 378
Case: WILLIE (WILLIAM) SLANEY versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1140] (1955) Section: BODY 1955 Indira Solumlal v. Custodian of Evacute Propm,, Delhi and others Jagannadhadas J. [1955] The appeal is allowed and the order of the Custodian-General is set aside. …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
MATAJOG DOBEY versus H. C. BHARI
Supreme Court of India 31 October 1955 1955 INSC 61 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 925 Cited by 373
Case: MATAJOG DOBEY versus H. C. BHARI [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 925] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION MATAJOG DOBEY v. H. C. BHARI (WITH CONNECTED APPEAL) [S. R. DAs, AcT!NG C.J., VIVIAN BosE, JAGANNADHA-DAS, JAFER IMAM and CHANDRASEKHARA A1YAR JJ.] Constitution of India, Art. 14--Criminal …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
SADHU RAM versus THE CUSTODIAN-GENERAL OF EVACUEE PROPERTY
Supreme Court of India 28 October 1955 1955 INSC 57 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 1113 Cited by 1
Case: SADHU RAM versus THE CUSTODIAN-GENERAL OF EVACUEE PROPERTY [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 1113] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION For the reasons aforesaid it must be held that there ts no merit in the application and the rule is accord-ingly discharged, and the application is dismissed. SADHU …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
RAJA BAHADUR KAMAKSHYA NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COMMIS SIONER OF HAZARIBAGH AND OTHERS.
Supreme Court of India 28 October 1955 1955 INSC 59 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 988
Case: RAJA BAHADUR KAMAKSHYA NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COMMIS SIONER OF HAZ... [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 988] (1955) Section: BODY Octobtr 28 988 [1955] RAJA BAHADUR KAMAKSHYA NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COMMIS-SIONER OF HAZARIBAGH …
Sudhi Ranjan Das