All courts — latest judgments

71. RAJ KALI KUER versus RAM RATTAN PANDEY

    Supreme Court of India 7 April 1955 1955 INSC 26 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 186 Cited by 1

    Case: RAJ KALI KUER versus RAM RATTAN PANDEY [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 186] (1955) Section: BODY 1955 April 7 SUPREME COURT REPORTS RAJ KALI KlJER v. RAM RATTAN PANDEY [VIVIAN BosE, JAGANNADHADAS and SINHA JJ.} Hindu Law-Hereditary priestly office of a Puiari and Panda -Hindu …

    Vivian Bose

72. MAHARAJ UMEG SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 6 April 1955 1955 INSC 24 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 164 Cited by 202

    Case: MAHARAJ UMEG SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND OTHERS. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 164] (1955) Section: BODY . ·• ' \ . \ '. \ ''' 164 [1955] SUPREME COURT .REPORTS •, · 1955 High Court already pronounced against his conviction after a full hearing in the presence of …

    Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

73. SHIVA JUTE BALING LTD. versus HINDLEY & CO. LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 5 April 1955 1955 INSC 23 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 243

    Case: SHIVA JUTE BALING LTD. versus HINDLEY & CO. LTD. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 243] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS of nationalisation of text books. The learned counsel 1955 appearing in these cases have adopted in their entirety Rai Sahib Ram the arguments that have …

    Bijan Kumar Mukherjea

74. JUGAL KISHORE RAMESHWARDAS versus MRS. GOOLBAI HORMUSJI

    Supreme Court of India 4 April 1955 1955 INSC 22 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 857 Cited by 5

    Case: JUGAL KISHORE RAMESHWARDAS versus MRS. GOOLBAI HORMUSJI [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 857] (1955) Section: SECTION into individual acts which the donor is capable of per-forming and which he appoints his attorney to <lo for him and in his name and on his behalf. It is within the very …

    Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati

75. N.SATYANATHAN versus K. SUBRAMANYAN AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 29 March 1955 1955 INSC 21 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 83 Cited by 2

    Case: N.SATYANATHAN versus K. SUBRAMANYAN AND OTHERS. [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 83] (1955) Section: SECTION 83 circumspect enough to insert any such alternative 195~ clause as would have given the judgment or order of Tlze Sta~;-;,! JJ.ihar this Court the same effect as is contemplated …

    Vivian Bose

76. U.J.S. CHOPRA versus STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 25 March 1955 1955 INSC 20 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 94 Cited by 64

    Case: U.J.S. CHOPRA versus STATE OF BOMBAY [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 94] (1955) Section: SECTION fl)~ N. Satyt.JM1ho11 v. f(. Subramanyan and othtrs Sinhs J. 1955 March 25 94 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [l 955] a service is not an essential function of a sovereign sta·te. It cannot be rainsaid …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

77. SHIROMANJ GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE versus LT. SARDAR RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 24 March 1955 1955 INSC 17 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 67

    Case: SHIROMANJ GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE versus LT. SARDAR RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 67] (1955) Section: CONCLUSION 2 s.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS SHIROMANJ GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE v. LT. SAR DAR RAGHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS !VIVIAN· BOSE, JAGANNADHADAS. …

    Vivian Bose

78. THE STATE OF BIHAR versus M. HOMI AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 24 March 1955 1955 INSC 19 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 78 Cited by 2

    Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus M. HOMI AND ANOTHER [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 78] (1955) Section: PARAGRAPH [1955] 1955 because obviously section 25-A is only lln enabling Shiromani section providing a cheap remedy by way of a suit P~~t:;:t:,ik before the Tribunal itself. We are clearly …

    Vivian Bose

79. SETH THAWARDAS PHERUMAL versus THE UNION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 24 March 1955 1955 INSC 18 [1955] 2 S.C.R. 48 Cited by 148

    Case: SETH THAWARDAS PHERUMAL versus THE UNION OF INDIA [[1955] 2 S.C.R. 48] (1955) Section: ISSUES 1955 March 24 SUPREME COURT REPORTS SETH THAW ARDAS PHERUMAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA (and connected <lppeal) [VIVIAN BOSE, JAGANNADllAOAS and SINHA, J.J .J Arbitratio11 Act, 1940 …

    Vivian Bose

80. AS/12/1955 of KUNJU MEETHIAN METHARU MOHAMMED METHARU Vs THE BANK OF DECCAN LTD.

    Kerala High Court 23 March 1955

    .,... ·.·.·.···., • 3 . · 't..··.·.·•­ » Kunju r,:eethian Eetharu Mohammed Eetharu, residing at Mangalathu "I.Te1iyil, Aroor Muri, Aroor Pakuthy. By advocate Shri S. Bhoothalingam Iyer. IN THE