Filter results by 2

Courts

Judges in the latest 37

Years

Decided between

1956-01-01 and 1956-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

1–10 of 37 judgments, newest first (0.03 seconds)

  1. MOHAMMAD GHOUSE versus STATE OF ANDHRA

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1956 1956 INSC 77 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 414 Cited by 1

    Case: MOHAMMAD GHOUSE versus STATE OF ANDHRA [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 414] (1957) Section: SECTION 1956 A. S. Erishna v. State of Madras Venkalarama Ayy"' ], November, 29. 414 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1957J offence under s. 4(1)(g) to be in possession of materials, still, implement or …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  2. SURENDRA NATH KHOSLA versus DALIP SINGH

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1956 1956 INSC 76 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 179

    Case: SURENDRA NATH KHOSLA versus DALIP SINGH [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 179] (1957) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS SURENDRA NATH KHOSLA v. DA.LIP SINGH (S. R. DAS c. J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. P. SINHA and S. K. DAs JJ.) Election-Improper rejection of …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das, Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati, T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar and others

  3. LALIT MOHAN DAS versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL, ORISSA

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1956 1956 INSC 75 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 167

    Case: LALIT MOHAN DAS versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL, ORISSA [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 167] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS the manner it is used to do in the ~ase of other indus-tries where the conditions of employment and the work to be done by the employees is of a …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  4. BANARAS ICE FACTORY LIMITED versus ITS WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1956 1956 INSC 73 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 143

    Case: BANARAS ICE FACTORY LIMITED versus ITS WORKMEN [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 143] (1957) Section: BODY earlier that it is reasonable to assume that standardisa-tion of retrenchment compensation an<l doing away with a perplexing variety of factors for granting retrenchment compensation …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  5. A. S. KRISHNA versus STATE OF MADRAS.

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1956 1956 INSC 74 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 399

    Case: A. S. KRISHNA versus STATE OF MADRAS. [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 399] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R.. SUPREME COURT REPORTS A. S. KRISHNA t!. STATE OF MADRAS. (with connected appeals) (S. R. DAS C.J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. P. SINHA and S. K. DAs, JJ.) Madras Prohibition Act …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  6. HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA versus A. D. DIVIKAR

    Supreme Court of India 27 November 1956 1956 INSC 72 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 121 Cited by 151

    Case: HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA versus A. D. DIVIKAR [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 121] (1957) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA v. A. D. DIVIKAR (With Connected Appeal) (S. R. DAS c. J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S. K• DAs and Gov1NDA MENoN …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das, Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati, T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar and others

  7. MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

    Supreme Court of India 13 November 1956 1956 INSC 66 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 63

    Case: MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 63] (1957) Section: PARAGRAPH S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS There is nothing in the affidavits filed by the res-pondent showing that there was any particular circum-stance or reason for which the …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  8. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, AJMER versus RADHEY SHYAM DANI.

    Supreme Court of India 13 November 1956 1956 INSC 67 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 68

    Case: CHIEF COMMISSIONER, AJMER versus RADHEY SHYAM DANI. [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 68] (1957) Section: BODY 19;6 N.-15. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [19571 CHIEF COMMISSIONER, AJMER v. RADHEY SHYAM DANI. (S. R. DAS C.J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAJ!., B. P. SINHA and S. K. DAs JJ.) Municipal …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  9. ABDUL JABAR BUTT versus STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

    Supreme Court of India 13 November 1956 1956 INSC 65 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 51

    Case: ABDUL JABAR BUTT versus STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 51] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS present case, because they have no bearing on the questions which we have to consider in this case. For the reasons given above, we hold that the …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  10. CENTRAL PROVINCES TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD. versus RAGHUNATH GOPAL PATWARDHAN

    Supreme Court of India 6 November 1956 1956 INSC 62 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 956

    Case: CENTRAL PROVINCES TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD. versus RAGHUNATH GOPAL PATWARDHAN [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 956] (1956) Section: BODY 1956 Dwarka Dass Bhatia v. The State of Jamm11and Kashmir Jagannadhadas J, 1956 NOf.lembet' 6. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 956 [1956] In this case, the order of …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead