All courts — latest judgments

11. LALIT MOHAN DAS versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL, ORISSA

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1956 1956 INSC 75 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 167

    Case: LALIT MOHAN DAS versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL, ORISSA [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 167] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS the manner it is used to do in the ~ase of other indus-tries where the conditions of employment and the work to be done by the employees is of a …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

12. BANARAS ICE FACTORY LIMITED versus ITS WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1956 1956 INSC 73 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 143

    Case: BANARAS ICE FACTORY LIMITED versus ITS WORKMEN [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 143] (1957) Section: BODY earlier that it is reasonable to assume that standardisa-tion of retrenchment compensation an<l doing away with a perplexing variety of factors for granting retrenchment compensation …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

13. A. S. KRISHNA versus STATE OF MADRAS.

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1956 1956 INSC 74 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 399

    Case: A. S. KRISHNA versus STATE OF MADRAS. [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 399] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R.. SUPREME COURT REPORTS A. S. KRISHNA t!. STATE OF MADRAS. (with connected appeals) (S. R. DAS C.J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. P. SINHA and S. K. DAs, JJ.) Madras Prohibition Act …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

14. HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA versus A. D. DIVIKAR

    Supreme Court of India 27 November 1956 1956 INSC 72 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 121 Cited by 151

    Case: HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA versus A. D. DIVIKAR [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 121] (1957) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS HARIPRASAD SHIVSHANKAR SHUKLA v. A. D. DIVIKAR (With Connected Appeal) (S. R. DAS c. J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S. K• DAs and Gov1NDA MENoN …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das, Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati, T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar and others

15. WRIT PETITION 8481 of 2017

    Patna High Court 24 November 1956

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8481 of 2017 ====================================================== Ramesh Singh Alias Ramesh Prasad Sharma S/o Late Triveni Singh Residentof Village-Pura, Post Office Pura, Police Station Tekari, District …

16. DHARANGADHARA CHEMICAL WORKS LTD. versus STATE OF SAURASHTRA.

    Supreme Court of India 23 November 1956 1956 INSC 71 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 152 Cited by 151

    Case: DHARANGADHARA CHEMICAL WORKS LTD. versus STATE OF SAURASHTRA. [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 152] (1957) Section: CONCLUSION 152 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1957) DHARANGADHARA CHEMICAL WORKS LTD. "· STATE OF SAURASHTRA. (BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S. K. DAs and GoVINDA MENON, JJ) …

    Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati

17. KALUA versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 21 November 1956 1956 INSC 70 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 187

    Case: KALUA versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 187] (1957) Section: BODY been set aside. But s. 100 in terms provides that if the Tribunal was of the opinion, as it was in this case, that the result of the election had been materially affected by the improper …

    B. Jagannadhadas

18. AS/42/1954 of MAKKAR PILLAI & SONS LTD. Vs JOSEPH MATHAI

    Kerala High Court 19 November 1956

    Varadaraja Iyengar, J.,) Appeal Suit No.42 of 1954 (E) Judgment. Varedareja Iyengar, J: The suit which has given rise to this appeal was for money due under Exhibit D hypotheca­ tion bond dated 17-4-1107 and securing the balance under an overdraft account opened by the 1st …

19. RAJES KANTA ROY versus SANTI DEBI

    Supreme Court of India 19 November 1956 1956 INSC 69 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 77

    Case: RAJES KANTA ROY versus SANTI DEBI [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 77] (1957) Section: BODY S.C.R. failed to provide the proper procedure for taking of the steps hereinabove indicated for finalising the electoral roll of ~he Municipality. If that was the true position the electoral roll …

    B. Jagannadhadas, Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, Syed Jaffer Imam

20. MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

    Supreme Court of India 13 November 1956 1956 INSC 66 [1957] 1 S.C.R. 63

    Case: MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR [[1957] 1 S.C.R. 63] (1957) Section: PARAGRAPH S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS There is nothing in the affidavits filed by the res-pondent showing that there was any particular circum-stance or reason for which the …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das