Filter results by 1
Courts
Judges in the latest 93
- Sudhi Ranjan Das37
- Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati18
- B. Jagannadhadas13
- N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar13
- Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha6
- T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar4
- Vivian Bose4
- S.K. Das3
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
61–70 of 93 judgments, newest first (0.05 seconds)
-
BHAGUBHAI. DULLABHABHAI BHANDARI versus THE DISTRLCT MAGISTRATE, THANA & OTHERS
Supreme Court of India 8 May 1956 1956 INSC 33 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 533
Case: BHAGUBHAI. DULLABHABHAI BHANDARI versus THE DISTRLCT MAGISTRATE, THANA & OTHERS [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 533] (1956) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS BHAGUBHAI. DULLABHABHAI BHANDARI v. THE DISTRlCT MAGISTRATE, TRANA & OTHERS (with connected petition) [S. R~ DAS c. J. …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
JASWANTRAI MANILAL AKHANEY versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY.
Supreme Court of India 4 May 1956 1956 INSC 31 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 483 Cited by 1
Case: JASWANTRAI MANILAL AKHANEY versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 483] (1956) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS 483 S.C.R. which the State authorities took against the appellants in prosecuting them under section 9 of the Act was unjustified as the slogans uttered …
Vivian Bose
-
KARTAR SINGH & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB.
Supreme Court of India 26 April 1956 1956 INSC 30 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 476
Case: KARTAR SINGH & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 476] (1956) Section: CONCLUSION 19~6 AJ>ril 26 KARTAR SINGH & OTHERS "· THE STATE OF PUNJAB. [BHAOWATI and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR, JJ.] Punjab Security of the Stole Act, 1953 (Punjab Act XII of 1953), s. …
N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar
-
NAGUBAI AMMAL & OTHERS versus B. SHAMA RAO & OTHERS.
Supreme Court of India 26 April 1956 1956 INSC 29 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 451 Cited by 7
Case: NAGUBAI AMMAL & OTHERS versus B. SHAMA RAO & OTHERS. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 451] (1956) Section: PARAGRAPH S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS NAGUBAI AMMAL & OTHERS v. B. SHAMA RAO & OTHERS. [S. R. DAS, C.J., VENKATARAMA AYYAR and JAFER IMAM JJ.] Lis pendens, Scope of-If prevents …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
CH. TIKA RAMJI & OTHERS, ETC. versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS.
Supreme Court of India 24 April 1956 1956 INSC 28 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 393 Cited by 387
Case: CH. TIKA RAMJI & OTHERS, ETC. versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 393] (1956) Section: BODY grounds on which the detention is based and the nature of activities imputed therein to the appellant. It is unnecessary, therefore, to deal in this case …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
LAWRENCE JOACHIM JOSEPH D'SOUZA versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY.
Supreme Court of India 24 April 1956 1956 INSC 27 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 382
Case: LAWRENCE JOACHIM JOSEPH D'SOUZA versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 382] (1956) Section: SECTION 1956 MosebKaka Chowd/lry alias Moseb Chowdhry and another v. The State of West Bengat J agannadhada$ J. 382 necessitate a retrial, is one that ought to be put for-ward …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY ALIAS MOSEB CHOWDHRY AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL.
Supreme Court of India 18 April 1956 1956 INSC 26 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 372
Case: MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY ALIAS MOSEB CHOWDHRY AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 372] (1956) Section: SECTION 1956 April 18 MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY alias MOSEB CHOWDHRY AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL. [JAGANNADHADAS and B. P. SINHA JJ.) J1<ry …
B. Jagannadhadas, Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha
-
BASDEV versus THE STATE OF PEPSU
Supreme Court of India 17 April 1956 1956 INSC 25 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 363
Case: BASDEV versus THE STATE OF PEPSU [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 363] (1956) Section: BODY 363 S.C.R. 24th August 1954 pa§sed in Civil Miscellaneous Writ No. 45 of 1954, after their application for leave to ap-peal to this Court had been dismissed by that Court's order dated the 5th …
N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar
-
BANARSI DAS & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS.
Supreme Court of India 16 April 1956 1956 INSC 24 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 357
Case: BANARSI DAS & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS. [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 357] (1956) Section: BODY The respondent raised the contention that the State had no locus standi to intervene in these proceedings and at the stage of appeal, but in the view which we have …
Sudhi Ranjan Das
-
RAJA BHAIREBENDRA NARAYAN BHUP versus THE STATE OF ASSAM
Supreme Court of India 11 April 1956 1956 INSC 23 [1956] 1 S.C.R. 303
Case: RAJA BHAIREBENDRA NARAYAN BHUP versus THE STATE OF ASSAM [[1956] 1 S.C.R. 303] (1956) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS RAJA BHAIREBENDRA NARAYAN BHUP v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (with connected appeal) [S. R. DAS, C.J., BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. P. SINHA and JAFER IMAM …
Sudhi Ranjan Das