Filter results by 2

Courts

Judges in the latest 41

Years

Decided between

1957-01-01 and 1957-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

1–10 of 41 judgments, newest first (0.07 seconds)

  1. KHEM CHAND versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 13 December 1957 1957 INSC 114 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1080 Cited by 265

    Case: KHEM CHAND versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1080] (1958) Section: BODY 1080 SUPRE.ME UOURT REPORTS [1958] 1!JfJ1 Jagannath B~litra nnd Otliers v. Raja Harihar Singh Mardaraj BAramarbaro Ro, .1Ihtv,;umt1 J. Act which applied to the dispute which arose …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  2. P. BALAKOTAIAH versus THE UNION OF INDLA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 3 December 1957 1957 INSC 111 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1052

    Case: P. BALAKOTAIAH versus THE UNION OF INDLA AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1052] (1958) Section: PARAGRAPH SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1958] P. BALAK-OTAIAH v. THE UNION OF INDlA AND OTHERS (and connected appeals) 1951 (S. R. DAS, C. J., VENKA!TARAMA AIYAR, S. K. DAS, A. K. v ... …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  3. RAJVI AMAR SINGH versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1957 1957 INSC 109 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1015

    Case: RAJVI AMAR SINGH versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1015] (1958) Section: BODY 1015 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS (supra), there was a decree, and the requirements of s. 205 were satisfied. Here, there is only a finding on a preliminary issue, and there is no …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  4. SARDAR SYEDNA TAHER SAIFUDDIN SAHEB versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 27 November 1957 1957 INSC 108 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1010 Cited by 1

    Case: SARDAR SYEDNA TAHER SAIFUDDIN SAHEB versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1010] (1958) Section: BODY iV11l'e111ber, 27. [1958) SARDAR SYEDNA TAHER SAIFUDDIN SAHEB v. THE STATE OF BOMBAY (S. R. DAS c. J., VENKATARAMA AIYAR, S. K. DAS, A. K. SARKAR and VIVIAN BosE JJ.) …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  5. CHOUDHURY DHARAM SINGH RATHI versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 25 November 1957 1957 INSC 106 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 998

    Case: CHOUDHURY DHARAM SINGH RATHI versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 998] (1958) Section: PARAGRAPH 1957 Asa Ram v. Ram KaU venkatarama Aiyar J. 1957 November, 25. and that, accordingly, the tenant acquired the rights of a hereditary tenant. That decision …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  6. MST. KIRPAL KAUR versus BACHAN SINGH AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 15 November 1957 1957 INSC 102 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 950

    Case: MST. KIRPAL KAUR versus BACHAN SINGH AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 950] (1958) Section: BODY 19S1 The Aggarwal Chambe•of Commerce, Ltd. v. Ga,npat Ra/ Hiralal KapurJ. 19S7 November~ 15~ 950 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1958] Liquidation Judge restored but in the circumstances of …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  7. SRI VENKATARAMANA DEVARU AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 8 November 1957 1957 INSC 99 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 895 Cited by 228

    Case: SRI VENKATARAMANA DEVARU AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 895] (1958) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS SRI VENKATARAMANA DEVARU AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS (with connected petition) ( s. R. DAS c. J. …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  8. NOHIRIA RAM versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 8 November 1957 1957 INSC 100 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 923

    Case: NOHIRIA RAM versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 923] (1958) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS 923 NOHIRIA RAM v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (with connected appeal) (S. R. DAS C. J., VENKATARAMA AIYAR, S. K. DAS, .A. K. SARKAR and VIVIAN BosE JJ.) …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  9. PARSHOTAM LAL DHINGRA versus UNION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 1 November 1957 1957 INSC 96 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 828 Cited by 2

    Case: PARSHOTAM LAL DHINGRA versus UNION OF INDIA [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 828] (1958) Section: PARAGRAPH 1957 It is true that the Collector of Customs has used the Leo Roy Frty words "punishment" and "conspiracy", but those The Supe~inwulent words were used in order to bring out that …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

  10. LEO ROY FREY versus THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, AMRITSAR AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 31 October 1957 1957 INSC 95 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 822

    Case: LEO ROY FREY versus THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, AMRITSAR AND ANOTHER [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 822] (1958) Section: PARAGRAPH 1957 entitled to copies of the material before the respondent lnayat Ullah previous to the issuing of the notice under s. 7 of the __ c'· d' Act. The …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead