All courts — latest judgments

131. SANTOSH KUMAR versus BHAI MOOL SINGH

     Supreme Court of India 5 February 1958 1958 INSC 3 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1211 Cited by 4

     Case: SANTOSH KUMAR versus BHAI MOOL SINGH [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1211] (1958) Section: SECTION S.C.R. SUPRKl\m COUHT H.EPOR'l'S I have therefore come to the conclusion that a dispute con-cerning a person who is not 1l workman may be an industrial dispute within s. 2(k). As it has not …

     Sudhi Ranjan Das

132. WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHL TEA ESTATE versus THE MANAGEMENT OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE

     Supreme Court of India 4 February 1958 1958 INSC 2 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1156 Cited by 89

     Case: WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHL TEA ESTATE versus THE MANAGEMENT OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1156] (1958) Section: CONCLUSION Fcbntarz.1 4. ll56 SUPRE;\'lE COURT REPORTS [HJJSj WORKMEN OF DIMAKUC!-Jl TEA ESTATE ~ .. THE MANAGEMENT OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE IS. R. DAs C. …

     Sudhi Ranjan Das

133. RAJA GANGA PRATAP SINGH versus THE ALLAHABAD BANK LTD., LUCKNOW

     Supreme Court of India 22 January 1958 1958 INSC 1 [1958] 1 S.C.R. 1150

     Case: RAJA GANGA PRATAP SINGH versus THE ALLAHABAD BANK LTD., LUCKNOW [[1958] 1 S.C.R. 1150] (1958) Section: PARAGRAPH 1150 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1958] 1967 Bombay Dyri!SQ <b MtJ/nujar.Mdinq .co.1W. \". The State o/ Bum.bay umd Ol/u:r8 V~nkaWama Aiytn' J. stated above. The …

     Sudhi Ranjan Das