All courts — latest judgments

1. CHATURBHAI M. PATEL versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

   Supreme Court of India 2 December 1959 1959 INSC 155 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 362 Cited by 20

   Case: CHATURBHAI M. PATEL versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 362] (1960) Section: BODY 362 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] '959 In those circumstances, the trial under s. 339 was held The State to be bad. We are not concerned in the present case v. with s. …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

2. THE STATE versus HIRALAL G. KOTHARI AND OTHERS

   Supreme Court of India 30 November 1959 1959 INSC 154 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 355 Cited by 1

   Case: THE STATE versus HIRALAL G. KOTHARI AND OTHERS [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 355] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION • S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 355 THE STATE 'I.'. HIRALAL G. KOTHARI AND OTHERS (JAFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, and K. N. WANCHOO, JJ.) Criminal Law-Pardon-Conspiracy and ·allied …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

3. N. R. GROSE ALIAS NIKHIL RANJAN GROSE versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

   Supreme Court of India 27 October 1959 1959 INSC 137 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 58 Cited by 2

   Case: N. R. GROSE ALIAS NIKHIL RANJAN GROSE versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 58] (1960) Section: SECTION I959 October 27. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] N. R. GROSE alias NIKHIL RANJAN GROSE v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL (JAFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, A. K. SARKAR and …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

4. ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF versus MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTWALA AND ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 115 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 749

   Case: ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF versus MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTWALA AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 749] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF v. MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTVI ALA AND ANOTHER (SYED JAFER IMAM and K. N. WANCHOO, JJ.) …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

5. CHIMANLAL PREMCHAND versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

   Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 117 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 764 Cited by 1

   Case: CHIMANLAL PREMCHAND versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 764] (1960) Section: SECTION 764 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] r959 was a graver offence; sometimes involving the security J ethanand Bet ab of the State, and so an amendment was introduced in v. 1949 …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

6. JETHANAND BETAB versus THE STATE OF DELHI

   Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 116 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 755 Cited by 4

   Case: JETHANAND BETAB versus THE STATE OF DELHI [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 755] (1960) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 755 In this appeal this Court can do what the High r959 Court could have done. We accordtngly allow the Abdul Rehman appeal and set aside the order of …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

7. THE STATE OF BIHAR versus HIRALAL KEJRIWAL AND ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 14 September 1959 1959 INSC 114 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 726 Cited by 34

   Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus HIRALAL KEJRIWAL AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 726] (1960) Section: BODY 726 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)) r959 s. 25E of the Act. It was conceded on behalf the , .-d respondent workmen that the lay-off in the factory was nsso"ate Cement d 1 f l' …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

8. CHHADAMI LAL JAIN AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 14 September 1959 1959 INSC 113 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 736

   Case: CHHADAMI LAL JAIN AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 736] (1960) Section: SECTION '959 The State of Bihar v. Hiralal Kejriwal and Another Subba Rao ]. '959 736 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] ground for permitting the application tO …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

9. CHINUBHAI HARIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

   Supreme Court of India 4 September 1959 1959 INSC 108 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 654

   Case: CHINUBHAI HARIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 654] (1960) Section: BODY r959 Vishwanath v. Th• Stal• of UUar Prad1sb Wanchoo ]. r959 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] ' only one below with an ordinary knife which, if it had been a littfe this way or that …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

10. VISHWANATH versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 3 September 1959 1959 INSC 107 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 646

    Case: VISHWANATH versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 646] (1960) Section: BODY 646 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] '959 The third contention of the learned Counsel for the Ramaswami appellants is a weak one. It is said that the official Ch•ttiar receiver does not …

    Syed Jaffer Imam